View Full Version : ND Filters
longisland.km
08-29-2007, 09:26 PM
I was browsing B&H's site over the weekend and found that they only sold three very dark filters: the Hoya ND400, the B+W #110 and the B+W #120. A bit of poking around the net also indicated the existence of a B+W #113 (although it might be discontinued). Are these the only ones around?
I ended up buying the Hoya ND400 on Sunday since it appeared the Hoya filter was the only one of the three with a multi coat. The B+W filters seem to be uncoated. Does anybody have one of these beasties to confirm?
I haven't had a chance to play with it yet - does anybody have experience with these dark filters? I am wondering if the advertised 9 stops of the ND400 is enough for what I want: sufficiently long shutters in daylight for waterfall and landscape shots.
timmciglobal
08-29-2007, 09:41 PM
You could always stack ND's especially if you buy slim ones and filters with front rings.
Tim
longisland.km
08-29-2007, 10:09 PM
Hi Tim,
they seem to be mutually exclusive though...pretty much all the slim filters I see have no front threads.
I suppose if I am really desperate, I could stack the ND400 with my 2 stop filter and my CPL...an effective 12 stops...and probably a vignetting monster.
timmciglobal
08-29-2007, 10:26 PM
Step back and crop :p
Tim
toriaj
08-30-2007, 05:35 PM
I am wondering if the advertised 9 stops of the ND400 is enough for what I want: sufficiently long shutters in daylight for waterfall and landscape shots.
You don't need high-power filters for waterfalls and landscapes, unless you are going for that eerie dark-daylight look. The ones you mentioned should be fine. Another tip is to shoot after sunset, or at least while your subject is shaded.
noyjimi
08-30-2007, 06:44 PM
i agree with toriaj, you won't need something that totally sucks the light out
here are some shots from NY Finger Lakes a few months ago, from 5D, 24-105, CPL filter
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i185/noyjimi/20070529-057.jpg
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i185/noyjimi/20070529-079.jpg
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i185/noyjimi/20070529-061.jpg
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i185/noyjimi/20070529-114.jpg
toriaj
08-30-2007, 10:39 PM
Wow, noyjimi, I love #2! Just beautiful.
longisland.km, I took this on a sunny day with NO filters of any kind (the waterfall was in shadow):
28134
longisland.km
08-31-2007, 08:54 PM
You don't need high-power filters for waterfalls and landscapes, unless you are going for that eerie dark-daylight look. The ones you mentioned should be fine. Another tip is to shoot after sunset, or at least while your subject is shaded.
Actually, I am not going for a dark daylight look...I just want to get a sufficiently long shutter speed for a waterfall shot so that the water gets a "smoothed" look. Earlier this summer I was out at Yosemite for the day but didn't get a shot I liked primarily because I could only be there during the mid-day and it was a cloudless day - so I ended up with a really fast shutter speed. There was nothing I could do about it - stopping down to f/32 wasn't cutting it either. I couldn't be there later in the evening. I figure that if I had the ND400 filter, I could have gotten a three or five second shutter and thus gotten the shot I wanted even in full sunlight.
Regarding landscapes...I am referring primarily to large static things which attract alot of people who kind of walk in and out. I figure with a sufficiently strong filter, I can achieve a really long shutter speed and have these people simply disappear and leave me with a shot with (almost) nobody in it.
longisland.km
08-31-2007, 09:03 PM
i agree with toriaj, you won't need something that totally sucks the light out
here are some shots from NY Finger Lakes a few months ago, from 5D, 24-105, CPL filter
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i185/noyjimi/20070529-057.jpg
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i185/noyjimi/20070529-079.jpg
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i185/noyjimi/20070529-061.jpg
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i185/noyjimi/20070529-114.jpg
Wow, I didn't realise the NY Finger Lakes had waterfalls like this - I like. Where specifically is this? The effect I want to be able to achieve even in full daylight is what you have in the second photo. Sometimes you can't wait for sunset or a cloudy day.
longisland.km
08-31-2007, 09:18 PM
Wow, noyjimi, I love #2! Just beautiful.
longisland.km, I took this on a sunny day with NO filters of any kind (the waterfall was in shadow):
28134
Nice! This is the effect I want to be able to achieve even in full sunlight. I can't rely on blind luck to get every waterfall to be in the shadows.
toriaj
08-31-2007, 09:53 PM
Thanks, and btw, it doesn't have to be luck ... it could be planning :D
Have a great time. :)
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.