Vich
08-28-2007, 11:00 AM
I rolled out of bed at 2:30AM and pointed my 300mm moon-ward. Even broke out the tripod.
Can't say I downloaded any yet - later. Just wondering if anyone else got any? I'll post a couple tonight.
RE: Dynamic Range.
My LCD showed a very different picture than what I saw. Trying different f-settings (f4 to f16) and different exposures didn't change the fact that the bright part was never the same size as what my eyes saw.
If I decreased exposure; the bright part (portion not yet eclipsed) was the right size, but the rest was dark. My naked eye could clearly see the rest of the moon.
As I increased exposure, the dark part was now approximating what my naked eye saw but the bright part (portion not yet eclipsed) was blown out and much bigger.
So I started yammering to my wife how "the new camera out has more dynamic range, and would do a far better job with this contrast".
I'd love to show her some proof - or at least get concurrence.
Can't say I downloaded any yet - later. Just wondering if anyone else got any? I'll post a couple tonight.
RE: Dynamic Range.
My LCD showed a very different picture than what I saw. Trying different f-settings (f4 to f16) and different exposures didn't change the fact that the bright part was never the same size as what my eyes saw.
If I decreased exposure; the bright part (portion not yet eclipsed) was the right size, but the rest was dark. My naked eye could clearly see the rest of the moon.
As I increased exposure, the dark part was now approximating what my naked eye saw but the bright part (portion not yet eclipsed) was blown out and much bigger.
So I started yammering to my wife how "the new camera out has more dynamic range, and would do a far better job with this contrast".
I'd love to show her some proof - or at least get concurrence.