DonSchap
06-27-2007, 06:45 AM
Well, in an effort to save a buck, I found a TAMRON Adaptall 2 200-500mm f/6.9 LD (Model 06A) on the 'bay.
Not exactly the lightest or the brightest lens in the world, but for the final $120.00 bid, it was kind of hard to pass on, since I have wanted a lens with that range on the SONY A100 for a long time, now. I considered popping for another SP AF200-500mm f/5-6.3 Di LD (Model A08), but at $859 ... that's a far cry from $120.
Heck, I spent $100 on that MF 500mm f/8 Reflex lens and it isn't anywhere near as sharp as this. Although the Reflex is significantly lighter, at only 10 ounces. It also is a fixed focal length ... only 500mm f/8 is available (or 1000mm f/16 with the 2x doubler).
Now, like the Reflex, this is a totally manual-focus and manual-aperture beastie, but when you are taking the "long shot" you usually have time to focus up. The Reflex 500mm is quite tight in its focusing, the long-glass is a bit more flexible, faster and easier to control. Also, the benefit of zooming is there, unlike the the Reflex.
Hey, AF is nice, I have to admit. My TAMRON Canon-mount "Di" has that ... so it's hard not to see the advantages, especially when you have a B-1B Lancer sweeping down on you at 800mph, shooting 5-fps in predictive AI SERVO AF, during the EAA Airshow in Oshkosh, by gosh!
Setting up the aperture, for the most part ... is a simple operation and you set the A100's Mode switch to S or M, to adjust your speed. Not too "lightweight" ... which is my watchword ... but, for $750 more? It comes down to "eventually."
Since I already have the Adaptall 2 converters for the SONY and the Canon ... it just seemed a doable solution. Am I convinced? Well, not quite :rolleyes: ... but I'll give it a run, for the summer. :D
I'll provide a side-by-side image of the two 200-500mm lens on their respective bodies ... so people may see what it looks like. Both are designed to work with film or full-frame sensors, but aside from sheer weight -> 97.7 oz. (06A) vs 43.6 oz. (A08), there are also tremendous differences between these identically-ranged lenses: The "Adaptall 2" is all metal and only changes length as you focus it. Its zoom change remains hidden inside the lens body. It is a pure glass solution with no embellishments. Discontinued in 1984.
25906
The "Di", on the other hand, is much lighter (by more than 1/2 due to a plastic body) and changes length as you zoom, allowing it to be significantly shorter at the 200mm setting. It has excellent autofocus and the manual-focus ring is very near the camera body, rather than on the other end, like the Adaptall 2.
25907
Edit: You know, the more I think about it ... nearly 100 ounces of lens is serious business ... :(
Not exactly the lightest or the brightest lens in the world, but for the final $120.00 bid, it was kind of hard to pass on, since I have wanted a lens with that range on the SONY A100 for a long time, now. I considered popping for another SP AF200-500mm f/5-6.3 Di LD (Model A08), but at $859 ... that's a far cry from $120.
Heck, I spent $100 on that MF 500mm f/8 Reflex lens and it isn't anywhere near as sharp as this. Although the Reflex is significantly lighter, at only 10 ounces. It also is a fixed focal length ... only 500mm f/8 is available (or 1000mm f/16 with the 2x doubler).
Now, like the Reflex, this is a totally manual-focus and manual-aperture beastie, but when you are taking the "long shot" you usually have time to focus up. The Reflex 500mm is quite tight in its focusing, the long-glass is a bit more flexible, faster and easier to control. Also, the benefit of zooming is there, unlike the the Reflex.
Hey, AF is nice, I have to admit. My TAMRON Canon-mount "Di" has that ... so it's hard not to see the advantages, especially when you have a B-1B Lancer sweeping down on you at 800mph, shooting 5-fps in predictive AI SERVO AF, during the EAA Airshow in Oshkosh, by gosh!
Setting up the aperture, for the most part ... is a simple operation and you set the A100's Mode switch to S or M, to adjust your speed. Not too "lightweight" ... which is my watchword ... but, for $750 more? It comes down to "eventually."
Since I already have the Adaptall 2 converters for the SONY and the Canon ... it just seemed a doable solution. Am I convinced? Well, not quite :rolleyes: ... but I'll give it a run, for the summer. :D
I'll provide a side-by-side image of the two 200-500mm lens on their respective bodies ... so people may see what it looks like. Both are designed to work with film or full-frame sensors, but aside from sheer weight -> 97.7 oz. (06A) vs 43.6 oz. (A08), there are also tremendous differences between these identically-ranged lenses: The "Adaptall 2" is all metal and only changes length as you focus it. Its zoom change remains hidden inside the lens body. It is a pure glass solution with no embellishments. Discontinued in 1984.
25906
The "Di", on the other hand, is much lighter (by more than 1/2 due to a plastic body) and changes length as you zoom, allowing it to be significantly shorter at the 200mm setting. It has excellent autofocus and the manual-focus ring is very near the camera body, rather than on the other end, like the Adaptall 2.
25907
Edit: You know, the more I think about it ... nearly 100 ounces of lens is serious business ... :(