View Full Version : Sigma 24-70 with a D80?
Viktorrr
06-22-2007, 11:37 AM
Ok, i've pretty much made up my mind about which camera im going to buy, the D80. Will also buy a flash, though im not sure should i buy the SB600 or SB800?
But my real dilema is with my lens choice. Ofcourse im on a budget, so i have about 500 dollars to spend on a lens.
I got my eye on a Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 , does anyone have any experience with this lens? I read some reviews about it. All of them say its pretty heavy (which doesnt bother me, nor those the AF noise), but i need a reasonably fast one.
Also, one review stated that it has severe problems with flare?!
Help? lol
tcadwall
06-22-2007, 11:43 AM
I can't offer anything about that lens that you can't research yourself. But, Unless you really know why you need of the SB-800 over the SB-600, I would consider taking that price difference and adding it to your lens budget. The SB600 is quite a capable flash. There is a little bit of benefit with the SB800 but most of the time, you wouldn't really notice the difference.
coldrain
06-22-2007, 02:16 PM
The Sigma 24-70 f2.8 is quite a good lens. George Riehm who posts on here from time to time likes it a lot. If you do not zoom tin to 100% pixel size all the time, it is quite a capable lens.
It does produce some CA, but most Nikon lenses do that too. You will have to go quite a bit more expensive for a better lens (the Nikon 28-70 f2.8).
So... if you are looking for a portrait zoom lens, this Sigma offers a lot for its money.
What reason would you have to go for an SB800 over an SB600?
Viktorrr
06-22-2007, 04:46 PM
I've done some more research, and still i havent found a lens that would fit my needs, and fit into my budget too! So i guess i'll stick with this one.
About the flash, a friend of mine has the SB600 (with the D80), and says he has some exposure issues with it. Or maybe his is just faulty...
D70FAN
06-22-2007, 09:58 PM
The Sigma 24-70 is a good quality lens, but I still rent the Nikkor 28-70 when I want the very best. I have found that the Nikkor 35 f/2 and 50 f/1.8 can do a very competent job in that range as well.
Most of the time I use the Sigma 18-125. Nikon NX and DXO take care of the warts. My latest favorite lens is the Nikkor 55-200 VR... Nikon needs to design more lenses like it.
So there you have it. 2 relatively cheap fixed focus Nikkors... a couple of medium range Sigma zooms, and a really cheap, but suprisingly good, Nikkor long tele VR.
Photography on a budget. It can be done.
tcadwall
06-22-2007, 11:56 PM
About the flash, a friend of mine has the SB600 (with the D80), and says he has some exposure issues with it. Or maybe his is just faulty...
I don't recall any complaints around here about the SB-600. I wouldn't take anything away from the Sb800 because it is a great flash, and of course it is better than the Sb600, but REALLY, it isn't necessary for everyone. I have used my SB600 to do things that it couldn't be expected to do, and it has done a great job. Other than slightly more power, most of the features it adds, are not something you are going to need right away. The two units work as a team for you in the future, so if you want to get one later, they can both be used as remote flashes from your new D80.
if he has exposure issues with the 600, the 800 won't really change anything.
Viktorrr
06-25-2007, 04:49 PM
Thank you for your replies, if everything goes to plan, i'll be getting my d80 soon. :)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.