S2 Is

[willindeed]

Does it make any sense to buy a Canon S2 IS in February 2007? Is it wise to buy yesterday's technology even at a very good price? I have found a brand new S2 for around $200 and there seem to be few upgrades from the S2 to S3. Would I be a wise consumer to save $150 that I could use for additional lenses or is it penny wise, pound foolish to step back technologically in the rapidly changing digital camera world? The theoretical question intrigues me but I really look for replies from those who have used both and can make a realistic comparison. Thanks

[GaryS]

Tough question... And let me add one more variable. It is generally thought that Canon will announce a replacement for the S3 in March. No one knows what features it will have, or prices or anything like that.

So let me say this. I still love my S2, and I don't regret buying it even as newer models have come out. While the S3 is a better camera, I don't think it is worth the current price difference. But if it was me, I would be tempted to wait until next month to see what happens.

Does that help or make it harder?

[mattdm]

The S2 and S3 don't have removable lenses, so you can't really save for new ones (you could get add-on converters, though).

I think in this particular case, you're right that the S3 doesn't really add much. However, that's generally pretty well reflected in the market, and searching right now I don't find the S2 that cheaply at reputable places. I'd be a little skeptical of the $200-new price. Mostly I see it about $80 cheaper than the S3, at which point I'd probably say go with the newer model.