PDA

View Full Version : Nikon DSLR "Picture Of The Day"



Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73

T06
03-07-2007, 12:54 AM
Each carriage is a thousand tonne, most have at least 70-80 carriages:eek: Yes that is three locomotives you can see, we do things rather large here.;)

Lens: VR 70-200mm F/2.8 G
Focal Length: 200mm
Exposure Mode: Shutter Priority
Metering Mode: Spot
1/2000 sec - F/2.8

T06
03-07-2007, 12:58 AM
: VR 70-200mm F/2.8 G
Focal Length: 200mm
Exposure Mode: Shutter Priority
Metering Mode: Spot
1/2000 sec - F/2.8

T06
03-07-2007, 12:59 AM
Lens: VR 70-200mm F/2.8 G
Focal Length: 200mm
Exposure Mode: Shutter Priority
Metering Mode: Spot
1/2000 sec - F/2.8

Rooz
03-07-2007, 02:53 AM
added a quick but very mild colour overlay for sepia-ish. tis a bit flat i think.

50mm
f1.8
1/100
-0.3ev
Ap
iso500

rawpaw18
03-07-2007, 07:53 PM
21410
f/2.8, 1/1000, 200 iso, 200mm

shoeytennis
03-07-2007, 10:15 PM
rooz-great picture, seems wayyyyyyyy to soft and flat.try sharpening up a bit.

Rooz
03-07-2007, 10:30 PM
yeah i know. i was going for soft, but not so flat. my PP skills need more work.:p

sbnr
03-07-2007, 11:25 PM
Took this with my new 50mm F1.4 AF-D lens.

This lens IS sharp!!!

K1W1
03-08-2007, 01:29 AM
Near Wellington (NZ), March 2006

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/66/228161363_12e4546eff_o.jpg

Elisha
03-08-2007, 01:30 AM
holy crap....how far away is the truck?

T06
03-08-2007, 01:37 AM
Having a snooze. They fan themselves with their wings to keep still & yes the little bugger started fanning when I hit the button.:p

Lens: VR 70-200mm F/2.8 G
Focal Length: 200mm
Exposure Mode: Aperture Priority
Metering Mode: Spot
1/1600 sec - F/2.8
Exposure Comp.: 0 EV
Sensitivity: ISO 100
Optimize Image: More vivid
White Balance: Color Temp. (7100 K)

T06
03-08-2007, 01:39 AM
Kiwi a difficult composition but a great capture.

K1W1
03-08-2007, 03:47 AM
holy crap....how far away is the truck?

Can't remember. The shot was taken with the 18-55 kit lens and I was maybe 10 feet from the seal and the truck was perhaps 30 feet behind it.
Here is another for comparison. Unfortunately I couldn't get my sons eyes open and the seal looking at the same time. What's the saying? Never work with animals or kids! :-)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/145/414522622_cc62da1144_b.jpg

Yomny
03-08-2007, 07:22 AM
Guys can you enter the exif date for the pictures posted, it helps alot to see the measures taken for such great pictures. Some of us could learn from it. Thanks

K1W1
03-08-2007, 12:35 PM
Guys can you enter the exif date for the pictures posted, it helps alot to see the measures taken for such great pictures. Some of us could learn from it. Thanks

I'm not sure about other hosting sites but my images are on Flickr. If you right click on the image and get the URL from the properties you can go to the image on Flickr and get ALL the Exif data rather than just a synopsis.

herc182
03-08-2007, 02:50 PM
A few I took this evening in a church yard....Comments welcome!

21473
21474

swgod98
03-08-2007, 04:20 PM
Here's one taken with the kit lens 18-135 when I first got it. As you can see, there's a bit of CA. But, check out that horrible distortion!! Can the tree be bent any more than that?!? :D

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/92/270395733_4efa6d1b21_b.jpg

Nikon D80 | (1/640) | f/13 | 18 mm | ISO 200

shoeytennis
03-08-2007, 10:05 PM
http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/893/picture008copyvs8.jpg

nikon d50
24 f2
1/250
f2 stop
little flash from sb 600
crop only in cs2

Rooz
03-08-2007, 10:29 PM
Here's one taken with the kit lens 18-135 when I first got it. As you can see, there's a bit of CA. But, check out that horrible distortion!! Can the tree be bent any more than that?!? :D

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/92/270395733_4efa6d1b21_b.jpg

Nikon D80 | (1/640) | f/13 | 18 mm | ISO 200

wow...way to run a lens thru its paces !! given the difficult circumstances that lens had to put up with taking a pic full blown into the sun, i think it did an amazing job actually. not perfect, but for a kit lens, (considering some other kits i have had/seen/used in the past), it has impressive capabilties.

Rooz
03-08-2007, 10:31 PM
A few I took this evening in a church yard....Comments welcome!

21473

is this shot handheld ? looks very soft/ blurry ??:confused:

personally i would go back with a tripod and take that pic again cos the composition is fantastic.

herc182
03-08-2007, 11:33 PM
Yeah they were both handheld....I need to buy a new tripod. the one i have has a handle on it that does not allow me to lock it in the vertical direction....really irritating. also its a mini one so i have to get on my knees....for all intents and purposes its a crap tripod!

In fact i recently read a review of tripods (in the UK) and the best one was only £20. But i cant for the life of me remember which one it is. Does anyone know?!

Rooz
03-09-2007, 12:03 AM
20pnds ? christ. :eek:

i;ve had a manfredo 190 for a long time time now and it is brilliant. most importantly...i trust it with my gear in most any conditions.

fogo
03-09-2007, 05:46 AM
http://www.jfogarty.com/thumped/swing.jpg

rtoo
03-09-2007, 08:31 AM
sunset shots are very difficult. I must have shot around 200 pics from different angles and was really dissapointed with the results :( Any recommendations on settings?

I shot this pic with a tripod, Nikon d70s and a Tamron 18-200 lens slightly zoomed in.

Thanks everyone for looking
rtoo

LR Max
03-09-2007, 09:02 AM
Straight out of the camera using a non-CPU macro lense. It was a little bit of a pain but well worth it. No processing because the computer lab on campus where I do all my work is closed for the next few days.


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/59/415106662_a165bf47e5.jpg

Prospero
03-09-2007, 09:12 AM
sunset shots are very difficult. I must have shot around 200 pics from different angles and was really dissapointed with the results :( Any recommendations on settings?

I shot this pic with a tripod, Nikon d70s and a Tamron 18-200 lens slightly zoomed in.

Thanks everyone for looking
rtoo

Very nice, rtoo. Beautiful colours and nice composition.

Sunset shots are indeed quite difficult to get right. Some things I can recommend are to underexpose such that you do not blow out any part of the sky (except perhaps the sun itself). Then I would suggest to shoot in RAW so you can adjust the whitebalance afterwards, or use a whitebalance mode with warm colours (for instance shade). Auto whitebalance tends to make the colours cooler in this situation, which causes you to lose some of the warm sunset colours.

I hope this helps.

K1W1
03-09-2007, 01:16 PM
Wellington waterfront March 2006

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/51/152977167_b4140fb26f_b.jpg

Camerajunkie
03-09-2007, 02:18 PM
The fam picked me up after work today and we went on a walk.....

http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p269/CamerajunkieD50/DSC_0163.jpg

Flash used: No
Focal length: 55.0mm (35mm equivalent: 82mm)
Exposure time: 0.0040 s (1/250)
Aperture: f/5.6
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix

Yup, I'm still in auto programming, but I haven't had much time lately to practice.

rtoo
03-09-2007, 02:54 PM
The fam picked me up after work today and we went on a walk.....

That's such a wonderful pic! Buddies :) Thanks for sharing.
rtoo

Rooz
03-09-2007, 03:03 PM
The fam picked me up after work today and we went on a walk.....

http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p269/CamerajunkieD50/DSC_0163.jpg

Flash used: No
Focal length: 55.0mm (35mm equivalent: 82mm)
Exposure time: 0.0040 s (1/250)
Aperture: f/5.6
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix

Yup, I'm still in auto programming, but I haven't had much time lately to practice.

beautiful pic. i reckon some cropping would make it even nicer.

Kellie
03-09-2007, 05:52 PM
The fam picked me up after work today and we went on a walk.....

http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p269/CamerajunkieD50/DSC_0163.jpg

Flash used: No
Focal length: 55.0mm (35mm equivalent: 82mm)
Exposure time: 0.0040 s (1/250)
Aperture: f/5.6
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix

Yup, I'm still in auto programming, but I haven't had much time lately to practice.

Aw, cute!!! It was definitely a good day for walking, although it looks like your weather was a bit warmer. :p

Rooz
03-09-2007, 07:08 PM
stunning kell.

tcadwall
03-09-2007, 10:46 PM
Very GOOD shot and conversion Kellie. REALLY like that one.

Rooz
03-10-2007, 03:13 AM
i have a few of these i'll upload over the next week or so. dunno why but they mesmerised me...must be the fire bug in me. :D

50mm lens
400s
f11
iso800
Ap

rawpaw18
03-10-2007, 03:57 AM
Kellie the black and white is stellar, it reminds me of a picture that comes with the frame already. Very nice.

Prospero
03-10-2007, 04:59 AM
Kellie, very nice shot. Works great in black and white. The smoothness of the puddle is great.

Rooz, nice shot, lots of detail in the flame.

Here's an old shot, taken last summer, also with a flame.

D50, Sigma 70-300
1/1000s, f/5.6, 300mm

21548

rawpaw18
03-10-2007, 07:06 AM
Rooz and Dennis there are forum rules about flaming:rolleyes:
21553

Prospero
03-10-2007, 07:07 AM
Rooz and Dennis there are forum rules about flaming:rolleyes:

LOL :D

I guess this will get me banned then :rolleyes:

21552

Nikon D50, Sigma 17-70, Lots of beer

Camerajunkie
03-10-2007, 12:22 PM
Well, as long as we're going with a theme....

http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p269/CamerajunkieD50/DSC_0011.jpg

Focal length: 55.0mm (35mm equivalent: 82mm)
Exposure time: 0.625 s
Aperture: f/5.6
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix
No beer ;)

K1W1
03-10-2007, 12:50 PM
I'm getting a bit steamed up about all the flaming around here at the moment!

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/146/416725390_a8c2ec3e54_o.jpg

D50
18.55 lens @ 26mm
f9
1/1000 sec
ISO 200

TraderJoe
03-10-2007, 01:15 PM
http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u239/TraderJoe_album/train.jpg

D200
18-135mm Lens
135mm
Metering- Spot
1/180 sec
F/5.6

Rooz
03-10-2007, 02:45 PM
ordinary bokeh in this one.

VTEC_EATER
03-10-2007, 03:47 PM
D50 w/ Tamron 70-300 F/4 - F/5.6 @ 300mm, F/8, 1/640, ISO 200

http://www.gixxer.com/photopost/data/500/Bambi_1.jpg

VTEC_EATER
03-10-2007, 03:53 PM
ordinary bokeh in this one.

Wow, thats quite possibly the worst bokeh I have ever seen. I take it the 50mm F/1.8 has 7 aperture blades then? ;)

What were the camera/lens settings to get it that rough?

Rooz
03-10-2007, 06:18 PM
Wow, thats quite possibly the worst bokeh I have ever seen. I take it the 50mm F/1.8 has 7 aperture blades then? ;)

What were the camera/lens settings to get it that rough?

its actually normally very good, but i had the sun behind that flame and morning dew all over the hedge behind against a high contrast environment and it was causing havoc. so i have to say in this case, the lazy man, (i shoulda waited for better conditions !), behind the lens was more to blame than the lens. as is usually the case !:D

Rooz
03-10-2007, 06:24 PM
loving the b/w's kell. you can also try bumping up the contrast a little in levels/ curves to overcome some of the flatness if you like.

Kellie
03-10-2007, 07:08 PM
loving the b/w's kell. you can also try bumping up the contrast a little in levels/ curves to overcome some of the flatness if you like.

Thanks. Actually, I hadn't planned on converting that one and only did because the snow in the background was dirty. LOL

It probably could use a bit more contrast.

lightinsky
03-10-2007, 08:13 PM
My first pics with the D80!!! Lots of fun... And this picture had lots of cropping too...

lightinsky
03-10-2007, 08:16 PM
even with Picture Project...:D :D

rallysman
03-11-2007, 12:22 AM
D50 28-200mm @ 28mm

K1W1
03-11-2007, 04:06 AM
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/172/417132145_453ef68f06_b.jpg

rawpaw18
03-11-2007, 04:09 AM
K1W1, Were you sitting there when you took that shot?:D

Camerajunkie
03-11-2007, 06:55 AM
If he was, then he's really, really good.... :D

rtoo
03-11-2007, 08:59 AM
I snapped this with my new Tamron 2.8 90mm 1:1 macro and using my D70s, handlheld. Settings were F 2.8.

I really like how the colors turned out, lots of orange but it all fit together so nicely and his expression is very thoughtful. He just turned 1 :)

XaiLo
03-11-2007, 09:59 AM
too cute, nice pic could use a little sharpening.

TraderJoe
03-11-2007, 10:15 AM
D200
18-135mm Nikkor Lens
Focal Length: 40mm
Metering Mode: Multi
1/500 sec
F/7.1
Exposure Comp.: 0 EV

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u239/TraderJoe_album/DSC_0188.jpg

sbnr
03-12-2007, 12:36 AM
Here's a barn in b/w.

leyo04
03-12-2007, 06:35 PM
d80, kit lens 18-135mm

http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q283/leyo04/2007_03_11%20-%20Edwin%20Mel%20Wedding/DSC_0309.jpg

VTEC_EATER
03-12-2007, 08:02 PM
Lets see if Yahoo will let me attach this image.

D50 w/ Tamron 70-300 F/4 - F/5.6 @ 300mm, F/5.6, 1/1000, ISO 200

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/129/419557053_2d22f97628_o.jpg

rtoo
03-12-2007, 09:00 PM
It's funny.. I was on a mission this past weekend to take some shots of a missionary at sunset, but for some reason I was instead drawn to these lovely yellow tulips. Enjoy :)

Incidentally, this is actually an HDR shot i took -1 0 +1 and merged with photomatix and then tweeked a bit with PS CS2.

sbnr
03-13-2007, 12:21 AM
D50 F1.4 50mm lens
Mini water-fall off the hiking trail near Bass Lake, California.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/snbr21/splash_1copy.jpg

Camerajunkie
03-13-2007, 08:07 AM
It's funny.. I was on a mission this past weekend to take some shots of a missionary at sunset, but for some reason I was instead drawn to these lovely yellow tulips. Enjoy :)


Those are daffodils. :)

rtoo
03-13-2007, 11:38 AM
Those are daffodils. :)

That's funny you said that, I actually put in the caption on my flickr/photos/rtoo either Daffodil or Tulip. lol Thank god I'm not a botanist!

Rooz
03-14-2007, 01:52 AM
50mm
f1.8
iso600
upped contrast and cropped.

TNB
03-14-2007, 08:05 PM
Although I took numerous photos of a large fire yesterday (close, far, day, & night), I sort of like the following photo. Other photos are also on my website--all taken with a D200 and 70-200mm. If the photo doesn't show up, it may because the "host" has been rather slow and having problems lately.

http://www.tnbproductions.com/FireSBArea-08wmRED.jpg

Gsquared
03-14-2007, 08:29 PM
Nice shot Rooz... Ive been wanting to try something like that with my lil guy.

Gsquared
03-14-2007, 08:32 PM
Random rusty tractor in a field... I just really liked the lighting at the moment.

Camera model: NIKON D80
Date/Time: 2007:03:11 15:33:26
Flash used: No
Focal length: 70.0mm (35mm equivalent: 105mm)
Exposure time: 0.0040 s (1/250)
Aperture: f/4.5
ISO equiv.: 200
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/greg84mk2/Water%20Wildlife/DSC_0180.jpg

lightinsky
03-14-2007, 10:01 PM
TNB, fantastic shot.. very dramatic.. where's the fire, by the way??

This is a shot at the carousel in Central Park..
50mm f/1.8 @ 1/50s f/1.8

lightinsky
03-14-2007, 10:05 PM
Why does the picture I posted shows so much pixels? I had to reduce the size in Picture Project because of size limit. How did you guys do it?

Rooz
03-14-2007, 10:07 PM
Although I took numerous photos of a large fire yesterday (close, far, day, & night), I sort of like the following photo. Other photos are also on my website--all taken with a D200 and 70-200mm. If the photo doesn't show up, it may because the "host" has been rather slow and having problems lately.

http://www.tnbproductions.com/FireSBArea-08wmRED.jpg

great catch

TNB
03-14-2007, 10:54 PM
TNB, fantastic shot.. very dramatic.. where's the fire, by the way??
Thanks. It started burning around 5PM yesterday here in Las Vegas, Nevada. No homes were toasted though the brush fire was close to some homes. I took most of the photos from a nearby remote control airfield though I also took some on the way to the fire and a few night shots from one of the freeways--turn on the VR, roll down the window, and shoot.

Why does the picture I posted shows so much pixels? I had to reduce the size in Picture Project because of size limit. How did you guys do it?
I usually reduce the photos I post in the forums to 800x ? or x800 in CS2. By the way, the guy holding the baby looks sort of familiar...anyone special?

great catch
Thanks. I was able to get a few before the local police started hassling everyone despite the fact they weren't "threatening" anyone on the other side of the fire.

Rooz
03-15-2007, 03:08 AM
50mm
f1.8
1/60s
sb600 bounced
nx effect

lightinsky
03-15-2007, 10:21 AM
I usually reduce the photos I post in the forums to 800x ? or x800 in CS2. By the way, the guy holding the baby looks sort of familiar...anyone special?



That's no one in particular... just a random shot, cos I thought it was interesting... the contrast of a yawn on a carousel..:D :D

Gaffle
03-15-2007, 11:46 AM
I went to the Xavier-Detroit game last night and decided to see how the 18-135mm Nikon lens would handle indoors with low light. I had the ISO set to 800. The photo was hand held.

http://www.pbase.com/cincyimages/image/71266566/original.jpg

That is pretty impressive. Did you tweak the picture at all? Also, did you sneak that lens into the game? I had thought there was a cap on the size of your lens at some sporting events.

jcon
03-15-2007, 11:56 AM
I hope Cincy is still around, I enjoy seeing his images.

regP
03-15-2007, 11:58 AM
That is pretty impressive. Did you tweak the picture at all? Also, did you sneak that lens into the game? I had thought there was a cap on the size of your lens at some sporting events.



why is there a cap? :confused:

tcadwall
03-15-2007, 12:05 PM
Stinks that there is a cap. But read the back of your ticket for an event. Chances are, any shots that you take, you don't own - since by using the ticket you have agreed to their terms.... That THEY own the copyright on all representation of the event, still photos, video, even your own sketches!

Now, I am not sure that this holds water, but who really wants the headache either?

I barely made it through security with my 18-200mm VR lens (Minor league hockey). Good thing I didn't extend it for them. The guard told me that the lens was too long (it was longer than his "measure card" by maybe an 8th of an inch). I had already removed the lenscap for inspection, and so I offered to remove the UV filter - since I was going to do that anyway. They then just let me pass.

jcon
03-15-2007, 12:47 PM
This is one thing that pisses me off. Not allowing "pro" cameras or lenses into events. One of the reasons I went to DSLR was for when I attend commercial wrestling, I wanted photos I could get good prints of. Well I am lucky if I can get passed the front door. I have contacted WWE and they dont care, aslong as you dont sell them for profit. Its the arenas option to let you in or not with equipment, which I think is unfair. The people renting and or paying for the facility should determin what is allowed and what isnt.

Whats funny was a few years ago when I still had a Panasonic FZ20, I got checked halfway through a WWE Monday Night Raw show. The "head of security" came to my seat and asked to see the camera, he pulled out an actual credit card, no lie and said my lens was too long. I took the adapter off and it was fine then. What a joke, it wasnt even a DSLR! Oh and it was the Allstate Arena in Chicago/Rosemont Illinois, jerks! LOL

Sorry for my rant, just pisses me off, it really takes the fun out of attending certain events. People can sneak in with bombs attached to there person, but dam, you aint sneaking in a decent camera!

Prospero
03-15-2007, 04:31 PM
This is one thing that pisses me off. Not allowing "pro" cameras or lenses into events. One of the reasons I went to DSLR was for when I attend commercial wrestling, I wanted photos I could get good prints of.

Yes, such rules are ridiculous. But remember that if you were to sell your wrestling pictures illigally on a regular basis, you might drive a certain photographer out of business...
Not that that's a bad thing in this case :D

TNB
03-15-2007, 06:45 PM
Stinks that there is a cap. But read the back of your ticket for an event. Chances are, any shots that you take, you don't own - since by using the ticket you have agreed to their terms.... That THEY own the copyright on all representation of the event, still photos, video, even your own sketches!
I've been to sporting events where no such things were on the tickets yet I've been asked to quit taking photographs--though at times some of the "ushers" had little handwritten notes to disallow flash photography, interchangeable lenses, and lenses over a certain length. Meanwhile, I've seen P&S flash photography being clicked away. I've also been asked to quit taking photos in private places open to the public while standing next to around 100 others clicking away with point and shoots. And recently the same thing has taken place on public property. Ironically, many "legal bribes" or "permits" or "fines" may be imposed on those with anything other than a point and shoot--another reason, I still have a small digital point and shoot. The thing about being asked to "quit" usually means that I've already captured numerous photos.

K1W1
03-16-2007, 12:42 AM
Tell me you are not jealous of somebody who can casually bang a $10,000 lens on the ground,

Today's practice session for the Australian F1 GP. Pit lane paparazzi.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/180/422867221_b8e48bcfa5_b.jpg

jcon
03-16-2007, 01:06 AM
K1W1, I LOVE open wheel racing(Andrettis rule!!!), care to share any pics from the practice?

And ofcourse he dont care about the gear hitting the ground, look at the brand!:D LOL

K1W1
03-16-2007, 01:31 AM
K1W1, I LOVE open wheel racing(Andrettis rule!!!), care to share any pics from the practice?


We are talking F1 here not Indy Cars but that could start a whole Europe vs USA argument.
Yes I will post some pictures. I've got about 220 to get through and see what is any good.

tekriter
03-16-2007, 06:07 AM
Here's the camera policy for the Scottrade Center, our NHL and college basketball building in St. Louis, MO...

"CAMERAS AND VIDEOS
Camera policies vary by event, are determined solely at the discretion of the show and are subject to change without notice. As of January 1, 2006, our new camera policy defines professional lens cameras as a camera with a lens greater than 200 mm. A camera with a lens greater than 200 mm will never be allowed at Scottrade Center. Cameras with a detachable lens are prohibited. For most concerts, still, digital and video cameras are prohibited. For Blues games, most other sporting events and family shows, still cameras are permitted but video cameras are prohibited. Unauthorized or prohibited photography of an event may result in film or videotape being confiscated by show representatives. In all cases, the resale of photography or video is strictly prohibited. For details regarding the camera policy for a specific event, please call 314-622-5400."

Contrast this with Busch Stadium, home of the World Champion Cardinals (!!!...sorry)

"Cameras/Video Equipment
Both still and video cameras are allowed in Busch Stadium, as long as they do not obstruct another guest's view. Credentialed professional news crews/cameras are only allowed on the concourses and are not to film any game action unless given permission by the Cardinals."

I have NEVER been hassled by ushers for shooting pictures at Busch, even with my 80-200 f2.8 on a good monopod.

TNB
03-16-2007, 09:10 AM
Today's practice session for the Australian F1 GP. Pit lane paparazzi.
I caught some of the practice on the SPEED Channel last night. ;) And though some may not care for Indy/Champ cars, I'm looking forward to taking photos of the Las Vegas Grand Prix next month, especially since that race will run through downtown Las Vegas.

A camera with a lens greater than 200 mm will never be allowed at Scottrade Center. Cameras with a detachable lens are prohibited.
See the conflict? The lens doesn't even have to be "greater than 200 mm" if it is detachable--that would include a dSLR with a 10.5mm for that matter.

K1W1
03-16-2007, 09:34 AM
Here's the camera policy for the Scottrade Center, our NHL and college basketball building in St. Louis, MO...


Shouldn't we be trying to keep this thread for posting IMAGES? That was the original purpose after all. :confused: :confused:
Surely discussions about whether or not you are allowed to take photos should be on their own thread?

jcon
03-16-2007, 10:51 AM
We are talking F1 here not Indy Cars but that could start a whole Europe vs USA argument.
Yes I will post some pictures. I've got about 220 to get through and see what is any good.

Ummm, I am well aware what F1 is, I assume you know Michael Andretti raced F1 for a year? I guess since I am "USA" I dont know what F1 is. Sorry I asked, nevermind. I'll stick to my "Indy Cars":confused:

Kellie, I prefer the color more in this instance. I am glad to see you are posting here, you take very lovely pictures!

lightinsky
03-16-2007, 12:16 PM
Kellie, I liked the color one better.... more in tune with her bright smile and happy expression....

lovely picture of your lovely girl...

Prospero
03-16-2007, 02:00 PM
I agree. Very nice picture Kellie. Her eyes really come out great in both the coloured version and the black and white.

I also like the coloured version better than the black and white version. I think the reason for that is that in your conversion the blurred background is too smooth. In the coloured version you can clearly distinct your daughters clothes with the floor, while in the black and white the division between these parts is much less apparant. In that way you see less clearly that your daughter is lying on the ground.

Here's an attempt at converting your image. I hope you don't mind me posting it, if you do I'll remove it.

21853

I converted it with a channel mixer and the following settings:

red channel: 10%
green channel 20%
blue channel: 70%
You can do this in photoshop or almost any other image editor. I think using these settings, the conversion is a bit better.

Kellie
03-16-2007, 05:08 PM
Thanks for the compliments. :)

Prospero - I see what mean about the background and that conversion does look better. (and I don't mind you posting it)

XaiLo
03-16-2007, 06:57 PM
Kellie thought I would also gice it a quik shot I like the black and white. I also played with the channel in a different way and hope you don't mind me taking the liberty.



http://www.designsbyxailo.com/thepics/2007/03_mar/kellie.jpg

I apologize for not cleaning up my PP as well as it could have been but I just wanted to show you what was possible. And let me add it is a rather adorable picture. happy shooting.

shoeytennis
03-17-2007, 10:54 PM
well after along day of shooting i only edited a few photos here being two of my favorites, yes yes i know two sorry!

d50
50mm
f2
400ss
manual focus
cropped in ps no other editing!

http://img295.imageshack.us/img295/2373/adsc0174copyye8.jpg

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/4102/adsc0031copytc8.jpg

as always i am open to comments,yelling and questions.

jcon
03-17-2007, 11:16 PM
Shoey, I love the first one, great lighting, and hell, even a great model;)

The second though, I have a few suggestions. The composition isnt all that pleasing, top of the head is cut off, the legs are cut off, although it could work with legs cut off, if done right. Also, the backdrop is annoying with that clear plastic being too obvious. Also, the flash spot just above the back is quite distracting, that can be cloned out, though.

I hope you dont take what I said the wrong way, just tryin to help and offer my opinions. I do really love that first one though, it's very well done, in every way!


EDIT: BTW, how is that 105mm, I hear good things about it. Do you enjoy it? I am considering the 85mm, but if this is a good one, I may look into that aswell.

shoeytennis
03-17-2007, 11:21 PM
Shoey, I love the first one, great lighting, and hell, even a great model;)

The second though, I have a few suggestions. The composition isnt all that pleasing, top of the head is cut off, the legs are cut off, although it could work with legs cut off, if done right. Also, the backdrop is annoying with that clear plastic being too obvious. Also, the flash spot just above the back is quite distracting, that can be cloned out, though.

I hope you dont take what I said the wrong way, just tryin to help and offer my opinions. I do really love that first one though, it's very well done, in every way!

no everything you said i completey agree with. the shoot was in this huge building and all the windows had those anoyying plastic on it for the most part. and those stairs were in a hallway and i only had my 50m lens lol and i was packed against a wall.i do apreciate the comment i would never take anything you said the wrong way hehe.

K1W1
03-18-2007, 02:42 AM
Friday Practice

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/169/424973989_72c0a70601_b.jpg

leyo04
03-18-2007, 05:44 AM
d70s 18-70mm

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/151/424886541_4fa025d27b.jpg

davew
03-18-2007, 12:42 PM
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/179/425592458_6afa4b229c_o.jpg

Stoller
03-18-2007, 05:52 PM
D200
Sigma 70-200 2.8
120 mm
1/640
f4
ISO 250

http://mnt-publishing.smugmug.com/photos/136962218-M-1.jpg

D50
Sigma 28-70 2.8
70mm
1/500
f8
ISO 200

http://mnt-publishing.smugmug.com/photos/136963254-M-1.jpg

toriaj
03-18-2007, 06:35 PM
I was on a long dirt road taking pictures of the cliffs, when I saw this tunnel leading under the railroad tracks.

21962

Comments, suggestions, edits much appreciated! This was my first time correcting CA. I used Lightroom. I was surprised at how simple and effective it was.

jcon
03-18-2007, 06:47 PM
Stoller, did you put on the pads and get attacked by the dog?:D

shoeytennis
03-18-2007, 10:52 PM
toriaj-I do like it its a very cool shot. i liek its darkand the middle is light and crystal clear.

shoot me again but 2 shots from saturday.
d50
50mm
400ss
f2
manual focus and flashyness
the second shot was alittle dark but I had to PS it cuz i liked it to much is why it may not seem as clear.

http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/928/ma2fj1.jpg


http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/116/l3so2.jpg

As always i enjoy praise yelling and questions.

Stoller
03-19-2007, 06:21 AM
Stoller, did you put on the pads and get attacked by the dog?:D

No pads, dogs are well trained and only attack who the owner tells them to. Just don't piss off the owners... :D

Bob_Benner
03-19-2007, 11:09 AM
Taken with my D50

http://pic50.picturetrail.com/VOL433/1038293/14438158/239075275.jpg

Geoff Chandler
03-19-2007, 03:32 PM
Maybe this should be in the flower thread?
Dunno
I liked the softness of this when I got it on my screen ~
Doesn't have to always be tak sharp!
cropped and framed - reduced to post
D80 plus Sigma 17 - 70

Rooz
03-19-2007, 06:41 PM
Taken with my D50

http://pic50.picturetrail.com/VOL433/1038293/14438158/239075275.jpg

great shot. love the highlights on his cheeks offset by the black background !

rallysman
03-19-2007, 07:16 PM
D50
Sometimes when people don't want to have their picture taken the shots come out halfway decent:)

shoeytennis
03-19-2007, 10:27 PM
d50
50mm
f2
400ss
manual flash and foca
edited coverted and fun in cs2

http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/3716/m4as8.jpg

toriaj
03-19-2007, 11:17 PM
Shoey, I like that shot. Did the real rose have that shading from red to gray on the left? Or is it a result of the PP?

Thanks for your comments on my shot. And I see why you liked the one with the baseball bat :)

Rooz
03-19-2007, 11:30 PM
D50
Sometimes when people don't want to have their picture taken the shots come out halfway decent:)

i love this shot. i;d peak up the levels a tad though to give it more definition.

Rooz
03-20-2007, 12:44 AM
f8
iso400
Ap
50mm f1.8
sepia and some grain added in lightroom

T06
03-20-2007, 02:10 AM
Just kidding mate. The hairy arm kinda gets a grind though.:(

T06
03-20-2007, 02:12 AM
;) How old was that child in that pic?
That in my mind is a great shot to have of ones child. The pride & emotion '&' the photo of you were once this big. I've come to the conclusion you're an old snag sort of fella.

Rooz
03-20-2007, 02:50 AM
lol yeah, he's 5 weeks old and its still a novelty. :D

one more just for you mate.:eek: :D

Classic96
03-20-2007, 08:57 PM
A shot of my in-law's male Yorkie
Nikon D50
50mm 1.4 Lens
Exposure 1/60
f/2.8
ISO 200
SB-800 bounced

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/161/426176089_82bfe4acd1_o.jpg

TNB
03-20-2007, 09:17 PM
Cute smile.

swgod98
03-20-2007, 10:13 PM
Here's one from a couple weeks ago...

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/148/411028925_777c0c8e57_b.jpg

D80 | 70-300VR @ 70 mm | 1/4000 sec | f/4.5 | ISO 140

shoeytennis
03-20-2007, 10:42 PM
Shoey, I like that shot. Did the real rose have that shading from red to gray on the left? Or is it a result of the PP?

Thanks for your comments on my shot. And I see why you liked the one with the baseball bat :)

yes it is a result of post processing, i thought it looked cool that way hehe.
d50
nikkor 24mm
f2.5
manualla
i got new picture sfor like 2 years .
comments are always welcome

http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/2847/f5fl8.jpg

jcon
03-20-2007, 10:44 PM
Shoey, if I may..... I would lighten that up a bit, its way too dark. If you have Capture NX, use the D-Lighting tool, it works quite well.

Rooz
03-21-2007, 01:10 AM
d lighting used.

shoeytennis
03-21-2007, 07:49 AM
lol i use cs2, and it was bright on my end. i think my laptop is brither then everyone elses.

XaiLo
03-21-2007, 09:15 AM
Alright shoey, I have a CRT reedited in CS2.


http://www.designsbyxailo.com/thepics/2007/03_mar/f5.jpg

jcon
03-21-2007, 10:19 AM
Thanks for the post, Rooz. Shoey, I think you should play with your monitor settings, as you mentioned it sounds like yours might have a few messed settings, tht picture was VERY dark, and if it wasnt noticeable on your monitor, thats not good.

If I may ask, do you pay models to come or do you know these people and just shoot for fun? Im tryin to decide if I want to pay models to come in.

shoeytennis
03-21-2007, 12:29 PM
jcon i sent you a message

TNB
03-21-2007, 01:18 PM
If I may ask, do you pay models to come or do you know these people and just shoot for fun? Im tryin to decide if I want to pay models to come in.
Just visit one of the other sites where Shoey spends time: http://www.modelmayhem.com There you can browse and find someone willing to model for CD, Print, Pay, Etc.

jcon
03-21-2007, 01:26 PM
Yup, thanks Shoey and TNB, I already found one model in my area on there. Looks like a great place!

Sunesha
03-21-2007, 02:08 PM
I finally got my new camera. So I am was curious if my nikkor 18-70 mm could do some macro photography. The shoot was taken 15 cm from the figure. A tribal drummer. I am far away then that skilled as most off you guys. I been only doing photography for 3 months.

I was surprised, but had to do manual focus and other stuff to make it work.

http://sunesha.se/images/zoom/JBIJMT/viewsize/tribalwoodfigure-18.jpg

Sunesha
03-21-2007, 02:11 PM
Shoey, really liked that portrait. The subject have great personality in his look. I think you really managed to get it to show.

K1W1
03-21-2007, 03:07 PM
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/79/244333762_22e6d21e6e_b.jpg

davew
03-21-2007, 06:05 PM
I finally got my new camera. So I am was curious if my nikkor 18-70 mm could do some macro photography. The shoot was taken 15 cm from the figure. A tribal drummer. I am far away then that skilled as most off you guys. I been only doing photography for 3 months.

I was surprised, but had to do manual focus and other stuff to make it work.

http://sunesha.se/images/zoom/JBIJMT/viewsize/tribalwoodfigure-18.jpg


I have added a few hoya +1 +2 +3 to my collection and get great close ups now of fishing lures:)
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/163/427551241_3850a48c95.jpg


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/176/427549262_e52666cca7.jpg

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/163/427550730_76964389d5.jpg

You can even see the salt grains here in this bait
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/174/427551033_95e027e5f7.jpg

:D

jcon
03-21-2007, 06:50 PM
Kellie, A photographer in the making I see! I like it.

I see how it works in your house, you get the nice camera and the little one gets stuck with the little P&S.... Im just teasing:p :D

Kellie
03-21-2007, 07:44 PM
Kellie, A photographer in the making I see! I like it.

I see how it works in your house, you get the nice camera and the little one gets stuck with the little P&S.... Im just teasing:p :D


Actually, that is how it works. The girls have been asking for a camera of their own and now they have one. And I don't care if they break it. LOL

Camerajunkie
03-21-2007, 09:52 PM
That's how it worked in my house too. :D I got my new camera and gave the P&S to the oldest. If it gets used, not broken or lost, and liked... then I'll actually invest in a better one. After all, I went from a 2.1 MP Kodak that was 5.5 years old to the D50. :o

shoeytennis
03-21-2007, 10:52 PM
Just visit one of the other sites where Shoey spends time: http://www.modelmayhem.com There you can browse and find someone willing to model for CD, Print, Pay, Etc.

TNB r u on MM? or stalking me?!?!
Dave- do u shoot lures for your job or you just liek doing it?

d50
24mm
2.5
400ss
manual everything-as always i enjoy comments and questions.
hope its bright enough for you guys!!!!
This is an action shot if anyone didnt figure it out.

http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/9936/aadsc0109ld4.jpg

TNB
03-21-2007, 10:59 PM
TNB r u on MM? or stalking me?!?!
Get real. I'm a member of that forum as well as a member of numerous other forums, along with a lot of other members. For that matter, I do remember your post about education and how you got jumped on big time. That was probably the last post I came across of yours on MM.


manual everything-as always i enjoy comments and questions.
hope its bright enough for you guys!!!!
This is an action shot if anyone didnt figure it out.
Regarding your photo above, it doesn't appear to be in focus--I see subject blur instead of motion blur. I would have also tried to bounce the lighting and/or used a flash with a flash bracket.

Rooz
03-21-2007, 11:16 PM
Nothing technically wonderful, but I thought it was cute. ;)

i hope she washed her hands afterward...:D

Rooz
03-22-2007, 03:46 AM
it was bright on my end. i think my laptop is brither then everyone elses.


:eek: i suggest you suspend buying camera gear and get a new laptop mate. ;)

shoeytennis
03-22-2007, 05:34 AM
:eek: i suggest you suspend buying camera gear and get a new laptop mate. ;)

i thouight i calibrated my monitor and i didnt so i did and now i see what you guys are seeing lol

TNB- i thought you were on there just wasnt sure.

Yes i know it is out of focus, it was first time using a flash all day (ima natural guy) and it wasnt cooperating with me focusing, it was more of a learning day for me.

hey who else on here is on mm?

Geoff Chandler
03-22-2007, 06:12 AM
Flowers - ready for planting
(D80/Sigma17-70)

jcon
03-22-2007, 11:34 AM
Nice picture Geoff. The colors make it very pleasing.

davew
03-22-2007, 05:09 PM
TNB r u on MM? or stalking me?!?!
Dave- do u shoot lures for your job or you just liek doing it?


I own
http://www.basslurereviews.com

and

http://www.handgunplace.com

therefore i have to try and shoot great images for product reviews..

Both are non paying side hobbies

my real job is in the IT industry

shoeytennis
03-22-2007, 10:17 PM
nice dave
took this tongiht at my buddys band practice
d50
50mm 1.8

http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/3017/iannp2.jpg

Geoff Chandler
03-22-2007, 11:24 PM
Playing some Vinyl. Used the back curtain flash for a bit of movement
D80/Sigma17-70

T06
03-23-2007, 12:38 AM
What are the components you use, am into music in a loud way myself. Quite clear, pronounced, with naunce as well as definition too if I say so myself.:) ;)

Rooz
03-23-2007, 12:48 AM
another hi/fi home theatre fan. :D

XaiLo
03-23-2007, 05:34 AM
http://www.designsbyxailo.com/thepics/2007/03_mar/cha4.jpg

Geoff Chandler
03-23-2007, 10:37 AM
What are the components you use, am into music in a loud way myself. Quite clear, pronounced, with naunce as well as definition too if I say so myself.:) ;)
Well - it's all quite old now - but still sounds good.
The record deck is a Michell Gyrodec, it's got a Rega RB300 arm mounted and a Moving coil Ortofon MC25 pick up.
I have an old Denon amp (80W PMA 720) and two Denon 3-head casset decks which are almost redundant these days (DR-M34HR)
I also have an early RDS Sony tuner (ST-S370)
CD player is an old Rotel RCD970BX Also a CD recorder - Pioneer PDR 509
The speakers are Tannoy DC 2000 which I love - but sadly they are now in a small room and they sound best in a large room where they can produce the low frequencies naturally...
Thanks for asking
Geoff

Sunesha
03-23-2007, 02:55 PM
I have added a few hoya +1 +2 +3 to my collection and get great close ups now of fishing lures:)
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/163/427551241_3850a48c95.jpg


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/176/427549262_e52666cca7.jpg

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/163/427550730_76964389d5.jpg

You can even see the salt grains here in this bait
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/174/427551033_95e027e5f7.jpg

:D

Thatīs really good pics. Nice have to check out those things. Didnt knew that it existed such closeup to lenses. I have quite big african collection off wood figures that I got from my grandmother after her husband died, he used to exchange shavemachines for woodfigures in his africa trips.

lightinsky
03-23-2007, 09:23 PM
My first shot at macro... wooo... can even see the dust on the toy... does anyone recognize it??

shoeytennis
03-23-2007, 09:33 PM
My first shot at macro... wooo... can even see the dust on the toy... does anyone recognize it??

hmmmm is it mechwarrior,warhammer, or the game before mechwarrior.

shoeytennis
03-23-2007, 09:50 PM
im my buddys band photographer
i break the rules heres two pictures
d50
50mm
18-55mm
enjoy
questions or comments.

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/9287/adsc0030iw8.jpg

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/3600/adsc0052ev0.jpg

swgod98
03-23-2007, 11:24 PM
My first shot at macro... wooo... can even see the dust on the toy... does anyone recognize it??

Robotech. One of the original veritech designs. Great show in it's time.

sbnr
03-24-2007, 02:05 AM
A construction site:

Gsquared
03-24-2007, 08:24 PM
Carrera GT cockpit, as seen thru the Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye. Natural lighting, no flash.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/greg84mk2/Forums/997GT3RS/CGT03.jpg

Rooz
03-24-2007, 09:11 PM
nice shot.
is it yours ?

Classic96
03-24-2007, 09:27 PM
My boy walked for the first time tonight. Here are 2 of the photos I took of him. The first one was a bit out of focus so it was touched up in Elements 5.0

D50
50mm f/1.4
f/2.8
1/60 Exposure
ISO 200
SB-800 bounced

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/170/433141626_ea0bab9f7b_o.jpg

D50
50mm f/1.4
f/3.5
1/60 Exposure
ISO 200
SB-800 bounced

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/156/433134660_0a7e9ef979_o.jpg

leyo04
03-25-2007, 01:15 AM
my first tomato shot. hehehe....

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/148/433299322_e0facab0fa.jpg

XaiLo
03-25-2007, 01:26 AM
Moments to be treasured indeed, good captures.

sbnr
03-25-2007, 02:37 AM
I took this today in the Sierra National Forrest [California]:

rawpaw18
03-25-2007, 04:04 AM
leyo04 "my first tomato shot. hehehe...."


Look out because my tomato shoots back!:eek:


22174
1/5 sec handheld, f/4.5, 70mm, ISO 800

Gsquared
03-25-2007, 07:26 AM
nice shot.
is it yours ?

Sadly no. :(

leyo04
03-25-2007, 07:31 AM
leyo04 "my first tomato shot. hehehe...."


Look out because my tomato shoots back!:eek:


22174


hehehe nice one.

would love to shoot your tomato cam with this new D80 (it's my wife's.. not mine)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/157/433555160_535849faed.jpg

Prospero
03-25-2007, 08:50 AM
Leyo, very nice product photos, the lighting is superb.
Rich, I really like the tomato camera. Very nice collectors item.

Here's a picture of an old camera that used to belong to my grandfather. I used HDR, added vignetting and made it black and white in photoshop to give it an old look:

22177

sbnr
03-25-2007, 08:26 PM
Some pix of my friend's Jeep Wrangler while we were at the Dam:

shoeytennis
03-25-2007, 10:15 PM
d50
18-55
sb600
anyone with questions or comments let me know!
Enjoy.

http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/4867/aadsc0050zd4.jpg

http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/2821/adsc0045dc2.jpg

jcon
03-25-2007, 10:46 PM
A couple from my nieces first birthday party, she turned one last Monday! She sure loves her cake! :D

How do the skin tones look? I am having trouble getting them to look natural, they either look too red or too yellow, any thoughts?

Both taken with the 17-55mm F2.8

Rooz
03-25-2007, 11:00 PM
lmfao at the cake, thats some funny shit right there, great moment j.

skin tones look fine, nice and neutral. i personally like it a little warmer though and i find i get warmer more vibrant results from using the sb600 without it being too red.

Rooz
03-25-2007, 11:03 PM
Leyo, very nice product photos, the lighting is superb.
Rich, I really like the tomato camera. Very nice collectors item.

Here's a picture of an old camera that used to belong to my grandfather. I used HDR, added vignetting and made it black and white in photoshop to give it an old look:

22177

love it. this may sound completely ridiculous but i think thats one of the best HDR's you have produced.

jcon
03-25-2007, 11:29 PM
Thanks for the nice words, Rooz, its reasuring! I was worried I was doing something wrong.

I have over 200 photos to sort through, and I dont think the smile will be coming off my face for quite some time!

Rooz
03-26-2007, 03:49 AM
when you mention the "C" word in this house ! :D

Prospero
03-26-2007, 08:33 AM
love it. this may sound completely ridiculous but i think thats one of the best HDR's you have produced.

Thanks for the compliment, Rooz.


when you mention the "C" word in this house ! :D

I'm glad to see you are raising your kids properly :D
Nice shot.

mugsisme
03-26-2007, 08:44 AM
First time posting here. http://farm1.static.flickr.com/184/435176149_35ad15d25b_o.jpg

I have a D40, and I am using a 18-200 mm lens.

Leah

Prospero
03-26-2007, 09:55 AM
Very nice, Mugsisme. The colours and composition are great.

Here's my picture of the day, the result of some experimenting with the Sigma 17-70. I took this shot at 17mm and f/2.8. I kind of like the effect of perspective and shallow depth of field at these settings. C&C welcome.

22256

Sunesha
03-26-2007, 09:58 AM
I am very happy with my new Nikon D80, now 5 days later after purchase I start get familiar to my new camera.

IS0: 100
Focal length: 70 mm
F-stop: 6.3
Shutter: 1/160 sec
Lens: 18-70

tcadwall
03-26-2007, 11:49 AM
Prospero,

The flower looks drunk the way it is leaning.:D

if DOF was much shallower, we might think that the photographer was too.

Prospero
03-26-2007, 12:00 PM
Prospero,

The flower looks drunk the way it is leaning.:D

if DOF was much shallower, we might think that the photographer was too.

Yes, that comes from the remains of beer in the bottle it is standing in :D.

And no, I was not drunk when taking that picture :rolleyes:
(though, I must say that normally I only get ideas to take such pictures when I am :))

XaiLo
03-26-2007, 01:57 PM
http://www.designsbyxailo.com/thepics/2007/03_mar/flower8.jpg

XaiLo
03-26-2007, 01:58 PM
I'm going to keep this one short according to the denoted rules of this thread.

It does not matter when the photo was taken, as long as you only post ONE IMAGE PER DAY. You can add a picture everyday as long as it is different.

This being so! I find it more than just a tad bit hypocritical that someone posts five picks at the same time, of the same subject, in the same post, on the same day, and yes in this thread . And yet not one peep out of anyone condoning this action. What's even woarse is the person who started the assault and hijack of my thread posted two posts after this infraction and posted two pics of their own, of the same subject, also.

So I have a clear understanding now! Imaginary rules apply to "me" but perscribed rules can be ignored by everyone "else".

The attack on me had nothing to do with the fact that I started a thread about the D40. And I'm the one with the issues YEAH RIGHT!!!



Some pix of my friend's Jeep Wrangler while we were at the Dam:

5 pics


A couple from my nieces first birthday party, she turned one last Monday! She sure loves her cake! :D

How do the skin tones look? I am having trouble getting them to look natural, they either look too red or too yellow, any thoughts?

Both taken with the 17-55mm F2.8

2 pics

jcon
03-26-2007, 02:07 PM
Wonderful, someone wasnt given their bottle of similac this morning!

Hello Pot, Im kettle. Look at YOUR thread, how many did you just post there? Save your cry-baby moaning for some other time.

How funny, YOU of all people quoting the rules.

Someone please give XaiLo a hug!!!

Now worries folks, this thread wont be hijacked or ruined. I wont repsond to the whiner anymore.

XaiLo
03-26-2007, 02:37 PM
Wonderful, someone wasnt given their bottle of similac this morning!

Hello Pot, Im kettle. Look at YOUR thread, how many did you just post there? Save your cry-baby moaning for some other time.

How funny, YOU of all people quoting the rules.

Someone please give XaiLo a hug!!!

Now worries folks, this thread wont be hijacked or ruined. I wont repsond to the whiner anymore.

Funny I never called you a "hypocrite"... yet you decide it's appropriate to call me a "whiner" and "cry baby" oh you hurt my feelings so much. lmao

Don't act like a child just because your actions show you to be a biased hypocrite. You shouldn't have responded in the first place you just did a better job of proving my point than I ever could.

I just happened to point out your bias and unfairness and instead of owning up to your pettiness. You turn into a semblance of a sniveling twelve year old, who just doesn't know enough to own up and admitt they were wrong. And that their intentions from the begining were less than admirable.

I for one did not place any limitations on my thread unlike the starter of this thread. You seem to have this obsession with the amount of picks I post. Considering they don't infringe on the bandwidth of this site at all... and not like your the one paying the bill in the first place. I get your point! me posting pics upsets jcon so I shouln't do it to make him happy.

Sorry to have to inform you of this, you just picked the wrong person to try and bully. How much candy did you collect today?

fionndruinne
03-26-2007, 02:41 PM
Hey, I'm with XaiLo here. This is called a "Picture of the Day" thread! That means a single picture, not a ream of them.

On the other hand, there's no reason in the world I'm aware of that one can't create a topic where he can post a half-dozen photos.

This is a simple problem, with a simple solution. Don't let personal differences hijack your reason.

(apologies if I, a newbie here, seem overtly authoritative, but I do moderate on another unrelated forum)

Andrew

Prospero
03-26-2007, 03:04 PM
More than 900 posts after this thread has been started the rules have become a bit more lose. So What? I too post two pictures here regularly. I don't have time to post one every day, so I figure posting two at once every now and then is not a problem.

Up till Xailo's post, I don't think anybody has ever complained about that. It does have a certain advantage. A bit of flexibility makes sure that we only need only one thread with a collection of Nikon pictures (instead of one for every model). What is the point in having a thread collecting D40 pictures, or D200 pictures for that matter. We know already know either camera can take great pictures if the photographer is good.

True, people can post pictures of their own in threads they make for themselves, but to create your own personal photogallery is not what this forum is made for. If everybody started his own thread to dump his pictures it would become a mess. Threads in which advice or critique and criticism are asked will become lost in that mess.

Now back to the pictures. Here's my SECOND picture of the day. I took this picture in a reflex on the marketplace in Delft. Someone stirred up trouble and scared all the piggeons (yes, there is a parallel to this thread here):

22264

jcon
03-26-2007, 03:37 PM
I really like that picture, Prospero. The guy in the mid/right of the image is a great capture, I love his reaction to the pigeons! You really have some wonderful buildings there, I am very jealous.

On a personal note.... well said!

XaiLo
03-26-2007, 04:19 PM
More than 900 posts after this thread has been started the rules have become a bit more lose. So What? I too post two pictures here regularly. I don't have time to post one every day, so I figure posting two at once every now and then is not a problem.

Up till Xailo's post, I don't think anybody has ever complained about that. It does have a certain advantage. A bit of flexibility makes sure that we only need only one thread with a collection of Nikon pictures (instead of one for every model). What is the point in having a thread collecting D40 pictures, or D200 pictures for that matter. We know already know either camera can take great pictures if the photographer is good.

True, people can post pictures of their own in threads they make for themselves, but to create your own personal photogallery is not what this forum is made for. If everybody started his own thread to dump his pictures it would become a mess. Threads in which advice or critique and criticism are asked will become lost in that mess.



Prospero, I'm not complaining and I truely do not care what is done in this thread. What I am explicitly saying is I do not appreciate hypocrites. The short of it is my thread was attacked because it did not fit into some "clickish" sentiment as to what is and is not exceptable here and for no other reason.

Forget the fact that with nearly 3000 views it's apparent that there are some people who are interested in what it has to offer. I don't feel the need to toot my own horn and that was never my intent yet that nonsense keeps coming up... the "Some S3 Pics" and the "Some 30D Pics" threads throws every argument levied against me in the trash. But that doesn't matter because that's not what this is about here... what I'm dealing with here Is a biased clickish attitude that exudes "how dare I do anything that does not conform to the "clicks" self appointed code. Unfortuantely zealots comes to mind.

davew
03-26-2007, 05:52 PM
straight out of the D80 no sharpening
although i think it needs it
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/164/435213951_0d34c23c8c.jpg

swgod98
03-26-2007, 05:54 PM
The short of it is my thread was attacked

That was like a week ago. There was an argument over it, then everyone went their separate ways.

$hit happens. But, if you don't let it go, $hit stays. And it stinks.

spoonbb2
03-26-2007, 06:45 PM
Hello everyone, let me introduce myself. My name is Marlon and I'm a newbie to DSLR photography. I've been reading some of the threads on here for about 2 months now and how I got into DSLRs, I'm not exactly sure.

Anyways, please bare with me as I am am amateur to photography and DSLRs as well. I just purchased my NIKON D50 last week and I'm so happy I found a brand new one about 40 miles where I live. Almost all the Ritz Camera and Wolf stores were already sold out of them and was about to give up and save up for the D70s or even the D80 in the future.

I've read many good reviews in here about the D50 and with its price, made it my first choice. Today, I played with it around more and took some photos in AUTO, APERTURE AND SHUTTER mode. So I'm posting my first picture that I think came out pretty decent. Btw, I did a little bit of sharpening and lightening it up in PP.

Yay or Nay, please feel free to comment.

Thanks!

http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e40/spoonbb2/DSC_0023.jpg

D50
18-55
40mm
Aperture Priority
1/30 sec
F/5
ISO 200

jcon
03-26-2007, 07:00 PM
Welcome to the forum, Marlon! You have yourself a fine camera that I know you will really enjoy!

If I may make one suggestion, Since you own a Nikon DSLR, give Nikon Capture NX a try, it has a free 30 day trial. Its a photo editing program made with Nikon NEF/RAW files in mind. I think you will find it very usefull.

Once again, welcome to the forums!

spoonbb2
03-26-2007, 07:11 PM
^^^Thanks jcon. I hope Capture NX won't be that pricey. I'll be posting more pics sooner or later. :)

lightinsky
03-26-2007, 08:27 PM
Robotech. One of the original veritech designs. Great show in it's time.

maybe a little belated, but you're right on swgod98. It was one hell of a great show!!! love it even now!!

lightinsky
03-26-2007, 09:27 PM
Sorry, had to post two shots for comparison...
Can anybody tell me if this is bad bokeh?? And how do I correct it, if even possible??

first shot at f/10 1/200s at 110mm using sigma 70-300

second shot at f/10 1/200s at 220mm.

jcon
03-26-2007, 09:34 PM
The second looks better, bokeh-wise. A lower F stop would yield better bokeh. I think the longer zoom on the second shot had something to do with it being more smooth.

sbnr
03-26-2007, 09:37 PM
I'm going to keep this one short according to the denoted rules of this thread.

It does not matter when the photo was taken, as long as you only post ONE IMAGE PER DAY. You can add a picture everyday as long as it is different.

This being so! I find it more than just a tad bit hypocritical that someone posts five picks at the same time, of the same subject, in the same post, on the same day, and yes in this thread . And yet not one peep out of anyone condoning this action. What's even woarse is the person who started the assault and hijack of my thread posted two posts after this infraction and posted two pics of their own, of the same subject, also.

So I have a clear understanding now! Imaginary rules apply to "me" but perscribed rules can be ignored by everyone "else".

The attack on me had nothing to do with the fact that I started a thread about the D40. And I'm the one with the issues YEAH RIGHT!!!




5 pics



2 pics



I thought thie point of these boards and threads was for fun and interest in photography. Why should it matter if a few people [including myself] are posting multiple pix?

What is your problem?

swgod98
03-26-2007, 09:47 PM
What is your problem?

Someone got on his case for posting about 15 pictures in a row in another thread. There was no harm intended, just an opinion provided...things got out of hand and there are still bad vibes lingering.

Hopefully this can be put behind.

Since I'm here, I'll post a pic. Hope I haven't posted this one before...

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/147/386187460_53d9edb02f_b.jpg

D80 | 0.003 sec (1/400) | f/8 | 70-300VR @ 145 mm | ISO 200

shoeytennis
03-26-2007, 10:50 PM
d50
70-300apo
macroing it today

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/7857/adsc0007gr9.jpg

PS-to those complainging about amount of pictures. THIS IS A FORUM NOT YOUR JOB,get over it and go complain about something worth arguing about.

Rooz
03-26-2007, 11:21 PM
Sorry, had to post two shots for comparison...
Can anybody tell me if this is bad bokeh?? And how do I correct it, if even possible??

first shot at f/10 1/200s at 110mm using sigma 70-300

second shot at f/10 1/200s at 220mm.

agree with j, you need to try a lower f stop to get nicer bokeh. i wouldn't say it was "bad" but it is quite angular. not sure on the sharpest point on that lens, but i'd be going down 2 stops or more if possible.

looks like a lot of sun hitting those bushes behind though where you want to achieve a smooth bokeh, that always makes it harder cos direct sunlight will amplify the problem, especially if the plants were a little dewey.

rawpaw18
03-27-2007, 02:29 AM
swgod98

very nice, framing, background and subject.

Rooz
03-27-2007, 02:35 AM
D80 | 0.003 sec (1/400) | f/8 | 70-300VR @ 145 mm | ISO 200

loving that lens.

XaiLo
03-27-2007, 03:35 AM
I thought thie point of these boards and threads was for fun and interest in photography. Why should it matter if a few people [including myself] are posting multiple pix?

What is your problem?

My point exactly... well actually that is a question that should be addressed to jcon since he has declared himself the voice and justice league of dcresource.com.


No offense here but, posting 20 pictures within minutes of each other is a bit much. There is a Picture Of The Day thread and also a photo gallery forum. Dont get me wrong, I do enjoy seeing your photos, but I think its a bit much.

What would happen if there was a "Some D50 Pics" or D80, or D200, or D40x, and so on, it really takes over what the forum is here for. Again, I hope this isnt taken the wrong way, but its my understanding that there is a thread/forum designated for photo posting.


I am not really in favour of a D40 thread myself, for the reason that there already is a Nikon picture of the day thread to serve as a collection of shots taken with Nikon dSLRs. I feel there is no need for a thread for each particular model, mainly because ultimately its the lens and the photographer making the difference and the fact that a D40 has been used is irrelevant.

I was just pointing out the hypocracy behind his supposed motivation of truth and justice for all. Fact is I did nothing that is outside the rules of this forum yet I got my thread hijacked because it did not meet with the personal agenda of others. I have been called all kind of names, I have been told what my motivations are by people here.

But the truth of the matter is I did what I have been doing for months in these forums. Which seems to be readily dismissed because that would mean certain people would have to admitt they are hypocrites. And are in all actuallity servicing their own personal agenda, which is really what this forum is not about.

So I am just pointing out a blatant hypocracy, no problem at all. If anyone really thinks I am wrong go take a look at the "Some S3 Pics" and "Some 30D Pics" threads and see if they are anything but thriving little communities. Then compare them to what's been said and implied of the "Some D40 Pics" thread. And you will see who really has the problem.

Rooz
03-27-2007, 05:11 AM
if you took the same amount of time to type me out a HDR instruction post i;d be much better at it you know mate. :D

philwojo
03-27-2007, 05:48 AM
How about this, shut the H.E.L.L up all of you, if you can't post pictures in this thread, start a new thread to argue in.

I don't want to sift through your arguing over all this BS to look at pictures.

Move it out of here, or stop posting all together.

This is when boards need an ignore button so I can choose to ignore posts by idiots that have nothing useful to provide to a board.

Phil

Prospero
03-27-2007, 05:50 AM
if you took the same amount of time to type me out a HDR instruction post i;d be much better at it you know mate. :D

LOL :D.... that would definitly be a better way to spend time :D

I'll write a instruction post somewhere next week (I have exams at the moment). It is a bit too much time to write it now, basically because I still haven't figured out what I am actually doing myself :rolleyes:. Especially the photomatix part, I just play with these sliders until I get something usefull out of it.

By the way, what do you think of this one:

22289

I figured that the rainbow colours on a CD had quite a big dynamic range so made a HDR of that. I blended 7 images, from -3EV till +3EV. After that I made the background whiter in photoshop, because it was too grey.

Phil, I'm sorry about all the BS, I decided to delete my message, it would only have made things worse.

lightinsky
03-27-2007, 07:18 AM
agree with j, you need to try a lower f stop to get nicer bokeh. i wouldn't say it was "bad" but it is quite angular. not sure on the sharpest point on that lens, but i'd be going down 2 stops or more if possible.

looks like a lot of sun hitting those bushes behind though where you want to achieve a smooth bokeh, that always makes it harder cos direct sunlight will amplify the problem, especially if the plants were a little dewey.

Jcon and Rooz,
Thanks for your pointers! Will keep that in mind.

tcadwall
03-27-2007, 08:32 AM
This is when boards need an ignore button
Ignore directions:
Click the user name in a post(brings up user profile)
Click "Add [user name] to your ignore list"

I have done this twice. But then later often end up seeing their post quoted by others anyway! :confused:

Sunesha
03-27-2007, 08:36 AM
http://sunesha.se/images/zoom/IRLAZL/sheep-18.jpg

Sunesha
03-27-2007, 08:52 AM
Sorry for posting twice, but is my BW version nicer?

TNB
03-27-2007, 01:50 PM
One photo of many taken at a large race--there were racers there from all over the world. This weekend, SoCal bound. Next weekend, the grand prix. :D

D200
70-200

http://image.rcuniverse.com/forum/upfiles/70716/Om31764.jpg

Classic96
03-27-2007, 04:18 PM
Here is my boy at the park today, his birthday.

Nikon D50
50mm f/1.4
f/2.8
1/4000 ( VERY bright AZ sun today )
ISO 200

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/145/436936014_cfb2a4ca46_o.jpg

shoeytennis
03-27-2007, 10:30 PM
nice shot classic very crispy

d50
sigma 70-300 apo
f8
300mm

a plane a plane

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/5797/adsc0026ar5.jpg

Rooz
03-28-2007, 05:02 AM
i tried a manual focus on this one to make it real soft.
what y'all think, does it work ?

Prospero
03-28-2007, 05:06 AM
i tried a manual focus on this one to make it real soft.
what y'all think, does it work ?

Nice picture. I like the softness of the picture. Not every picture needs to be tack sharp.

I think in this case it's not so much the focus causing the softness, but instead the shallow depth of field or the slow shutter speed (1/20s is hardly handholdable at 50mm).

shoeytennis
03-28-2007, 07:34 AM
what prospero said, 1/20 doesnt make it soft it makes it blurry.

tcadwall
03-28-2007, 08:52 AM
To me the focus point (intentional or not) ended up being on the t-shirt. Thta is sharp enough that I don't think it was a blurry from hand-holding as much as focus point. The f/1.8 does help with this, since it shows a difference between the foreground that is soft, and the background that is much less discernable.

D50_England
03-28-2007, 02:15 PM
First ever posting too.....:)


Camera / Lens: Nikon D50 / Kit Lens

Exposure: 1/500
Aperture: f/5.6
Focal Length: 200mm
ISO: 200

Ketama
03-28-2007, 05:17 PM
If you like bugs, check this one out..
D50 with Kit Lens
55mm, f5.6, 1/125s

spoonbb2
03-28-2007, 05:28 PM
I went to the bridge today. Very nice day. Played around with my camera more. Anyways, I don't really know what I'm doing as far as settings for this pic.

http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e40/spoonbb2/DSC_0074.jpg

38mm
1/2500 sec
F/5
ISO 800
Aperture Priority

And of course did some sharpening in PP. :o

K1W1
03-28-2007, 08:50 PM
I went to the bridge today. Very nice day. Played around with my camera more.

Nice pic. I mean that and I'm not trying to offend you with the following comment.
The picture reminded me of something that used to make us laugh when we lived in SF.
We were constantly amazed at the number of people taking photos where it was obvious that a trash can was going to appear in the image and it got to a point where we used to joke about it all the time.

TNB
03-28-2007, 09:06 PM
Just another one of my "quick" panning photos from this past weekend.

D200
70-200

http://image.rcuniverse.com/forum/upfiles/70716/Qo38874.jpg

spoonbb2
03-28-2007, 09:40 PM
Nice pic. I mean that and I'm not trying to offend you with the following comment.
The picture reminded me of something that used to make us laugh when we lived in SF.
We were constantly amazed at the number of people taking photos where it was obvious that a trash can was going to appear in the image and it got to a point where we used to joke about it all the time.

Oh man I just noticed that. Haha!! You're right, for some reason trash cans will always appear in the picture someway, somehow.

jcon
03-28-2007, 10:05 PM
Nice capture, TNB!

shoeytennis
03-28-2007, 10:11 PM
tnb cool as always

d50
70-300 sigm apo
300mm
250ss
f5
manual focus

questions or comments.

http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/2088/adsc0016bo5.jpg

Rooz
03-29-2007, 04:18 AM
2 shots...and i'm not even part of the clique !! :D
the sigma one is on a tripod
the VR one is handheld leaning against a post.
Ap Priority
"More Vivid" cam setting
RAW resized for web.

unfortunately i didn;t have time to get in the car to go somewhere where i could get a better shot without the distracting foreground. what a shame cos these are the best sunsets i have ever captured from a colours POV. :(

Prospero
03-29-2007, 07:35 AM
2 shots...and i'm not even part of the clique !! :D
the sigma one is on a tripod
the VR one is handheld leaning against a post.
Ap Priority
"More Vivid" cam setting
RAW resized for web.


Wow, amazing colours. I think you just earned your clique membership :D

The foreground is not too bad IMO, I kind of like the silhouetted trees. Incidentally, the sky would have been great for HDR, too.

lightinsky
03-29-2007, 10:43 AM
2 shots...and i'm not even part of the clique !! :D
the sigma one is on a tripod
the VR one is handheld leaning against a post.
Ap Priority
"More Vivid" cam setting
RAW resized for web.

unfortunately i didn;t have time to get in the car to go somewhere where i could get a better shot without the distracting foreground. what a shame cos these are the best sunsets i have ever captured from a colours POV. :(

Great shot Rooz, I would think that the foreground was essential, IMO. it adds a sense of place and serves as a dramatic contrast to the colors of the sky.

tcadwall
03-29-2007, 11:37 AM
Incidentally, the sky would have been great for HDR, too.There is a new clique forming... It is the HDR snobs clique!:D

It would be interesting to see HDR BUT - Not real sure that it would help the image any. The shadows are clipped, but that clipping is what creates the - IMO - fantastic silhouette.

That is really where the extra stops are missing from the scene in my judgement.

of course, just my viewpoint, not necessarily law.

Prospero
03-29-2007, 11:45 AM
There is a new clique forming... It is the HDR snobs clique!:D

It would be interesting to see HDR BUT - Not real sure that it would help the image any. The shadows are clipped, but that clipping is what creates the - IMO - fantastic silhouette.

That is really where the extra stops are missing from the scene in my judgement.

of course, just my viewpoint, not necessarily law.

No, I didn't mean HDR with the foreground in this picture. In this picture the clipped shadows indeed work great. HDR with this composition would only have added distracting, useless detail.

However, what I meant to say was that if Rooz would have had time to find an interesting foreground an HDR would have been great.

tcadwall
03-29-2007, 11:56 AM
ahhh, that makes more sense... Silly me. Assuming that the local HDR KING was trying to recruit more people to his new clan.;)

As jcon mentioned it IS good to be having a little fun around here again.

Prospero
03-29-2007, 12:18 PM
My clan is more than just HDR :cool:. No need to make HDRs to become a member. Once you get that remote control you mentioned in the other thread which automatically posts your pictures to the Picture of the Day thread you can be a member too :D.

Yes, I agree, its good having some fun here again.

And for those who think the fun is just spam I combine this post with my picture of the day, taken in Delft.

Nikon D50, Sigma 10-20, f/8, circular polarizer:

22353

tcadwall
03-29-2007, 01:06 PM
naw at that point it will be auto-posting to the D200 SNOBS Thread that I'll have to start.:eek:

Nice shot AGAIN... That one looks good (even without HDR) - you could probably pull more out from under the bridge, and get some more saturated skies with HDR... LOL!

Prospero
03-29-2007, 01:48 PM
naw at that point it will be auto-posting to the D200 SNOBS Thread that I'll have to start.:eek:

Nice shot AGAIN... That one looks good (even without HDR) - you could probably pull more out from under the bridge, and get some more saturated skies with HDR... LOL!

Thanks.
Yes, I know, I could have made a HDR here too. But I had shot pictures for 8 HDRs before that (I think I posted about half somewhere on this forum) and a lot of regular pictures, so I was getting lazy ;)

Kellie
03-29-2007, 01:55 PM
Rooz - those are spectacular and I like the foreground!

I guess I better stop taking pics of my kids and get some nice HDR landscape/scenery shots to be part of the clique. :p

Stoller
03-29-2007, 02:05 PM
So what are the dues to be in the clique? :D

Rooz
03-29-2007, 02:33 PM
thanks all.
Prospero, i have this shot in raw, can i save some versions by changing the exp value and then combining ?

Prospero
03-29-2007, 02:42 PM
thanks all.
Prospero, i have this shot in raw, can i save some versions by changing the exp value and then combining ?

No, I don't think that will work here. The trees are so dark that I doubt there will be much detail when raising the exposure value. I think even at 2 stops brighter they will still be black. Also, it might lead to a lot of noise.

jcon
03-29-2007, 02:54 PM
So what are the dues to be in the clique? :D


First rule about the clique: Never talk about the clique.
Second rule about the clique: NEVER TALK ABOUT THE CLIQUE!

:D :D :D

Kellie, to me the eyes look fine, maybe its because its downsized, but they look sharp to me, maybe its different in the original size.

shoeytennis
03-29-2007, 10:45 PM
d50
sigma 70-300 apo
300mm macro mode
250ss
this lens is becoming one of my favorites now.

http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/439/adsc0015ht1.jpg

Rooz
03-29-2007, 10:49 PM
shoey why cant i see you photos most of the time. yours are the only ones i cant see sometimes ?? :confused:

shoeytennis
03-30-2007, 09:11 AM
shoey why cant i see you photos most of the time. yours are the only ones i cant see sometimes ?? :confused:

it was suppose to be dark but i think it may be to dark, hey my monitors are callibrated are yours lol.

jcon
03-30-2007, 11:32 AM
I think he meant your photo doesnt show up at all for him.

FWIW, it shows fine for me.

Rooz
03-30-2007, 03:32 PM
yeah, doesn;t show up at all. any techie here know what the story is ?

Stoller
03-30-2007, 04:45 PM
Might be at his work place like me. I can get on dcresource.com, but when photos are posted and stored on flickr or smugmug they are blocked sites so you don't see the photos. ;)

Rooz
03-30-2007, 06:10 PM
its bizzare cos its only shoeys pics and only sometimes. when i quote his post though the pic comes up. oh well. :confused:

leyo04
03-30-2007, 08:43 PM
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/203/440366814_4e48058d89.jpg

d70s - 70-300mm sigma

XaiLo
03-31-2007, 07:05 AM
leyo04, theres something really smooth about that capture. looks like the little guy has seen some hard times though.:)

davew
03-31-2007, 12:28 PM
http://www.basslurereviews.com//images/ardent_reels/dwhiteardent.jpg

jcon
03-31-2007, 02:13 PM
Dave, did you catch anything? Its getting close to that time here too! Do you have a favorite bass lure/spinner?

shoeytennis
03-31-2007, 05:05 PM
sisters wedding today i did the reception for her , heres one of my litle cousin he was the ring bearer/

d50
18-55
flash sb 600

http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/4572/adsc0127jy7.jpg

jcon
03-31-2007, 06:56 PM
What are you doing home posting pics from the reception at 7PM, you should still be at the reception getting hammered!:p

Classic96
03-31-2007, 08:21 PM
Nikon D50 w/ 50mm 1.8 (old lens)
f/4.0
1/800
ISO 200
No Flash
CP Filter

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/168/394908171_56efa38ebe_o.jpg

rawpaw18
04-01-2007, 02:38 AM
Hey Shoey,
Why do kids love those bunny ears so much.

Part of my crew at my brothers funeral, I mean wedding.

22468

Manual 1/50", f/ 4.5, ISO 800, 70mm, c-meter, diffused flash

Rooz
04-01-2007, 02:48 AM
lol i'm in my 30's and i still love the bunny ears. :D