JMWallace
10-13-2006, 11:22 PM
I have been researching my next purchase. I am keeping with the "higher" quality (unfortunately) non "L" range primes. I seem to be attracted to available light (thanks CW..btw, where has Jamie been lately) photography.
Although I wish I could afford the 85mm f/1.2, it just isn't gonna happen.
My targets at this point are: 85MM f/1.8 and 100mm f/2.0.
Prices are about $20 between each other. I have noticed the 85 seems highly regarded in this forum space.
1.)The difference between 1.8 and 2.0 should be negligable correct??
2.) What is the experience between the two?
3.) Does the 30D 1.6 crop "REALLY" cause any issues/difference?'
NOTE: besides MTF data, the ONLY specific data I have read is that the 100 gives a little more depth to images in a portrait setting, but I think that was on a FF camera.
Maybe splitting hairs, but......OPINIONS??????
Although I wish I could afford the 85mm f/1.2, it just isn't gonna happen.
My targets at this point are: 85MM f/1.8 and 100mm f/2.0.
Prices are about $20 between each other. I have noticed the 85 seems highly regarded in this forum space.
1.)The difference between 1.8 and 2.0 should be negligable correct??
2.) What is the experience between the two?
3.) Does the 30D 1.6 crop "REALLY" cause any issues/difference?'
NOTE: besides MTF data, the ONLY specific data I have read is that the 100 gives a little more depth to images in a portrait setting, but I think that was on a FF camera.
Maybe splitting hairs, but......OPINIONS??????