S2kDriver
09-22-2006, 09:07 PM
http://www.flickr.com/photos/s2kdriver/250203349/
This is a photo I took of the parking lot outside of my workplace. It was relatively sunny when I captured the photo. I set the contrast to minimum (to avoid clipping). Minimum contrast makes bright things less bright and dark things less dark - kinda brings everything closer toward the midtones area. Everything in the photo is within the dynamic range of the S3 and there is no clipping. However, if you notice, everything south of the sky seems underexposed compared with reality and it really makes the photo look "dull". See all sizes --> large size.
Am I correct in saying that I only have these 2 options, given the limitations of the S3?
1. If I wanted to properly expose the area of the photo south of the sky,I would increase the EV at the expense of highlight clipping in the sky.
2. I would leave the EV at 0, keep everything within the dynamic range of the S3, yet have things below the sky underexposed.
Thanks in advance.
This is a photo I took of the parking lot outside of my workplace. It was relatively sunny when I captured the photo. I set the contrast to minimum (to avoid clipping). Minimum contrast makes bright things less bright and dark things less dark - kinda brings everything closer toward the midtones area. Everything in the photo is within the dynamic range of the S3 and there is no clipping. However, if you notice, everything south of the sky seems underexposed compared with reality and it really makes the photo look "dull". See all sizes --> large size.
Am I correct in saying that I only have these 2 options, given the limitations of the S3?
1. If I wanted to properly expose the area of the photo south of the sky,I would increase the EV at the expense of highlight clipping in the sky.
2. I would leave the EV at 0, keep everything within the dynamic range of the S3, yet have things below the sky underexposed.
Thanks in advance.