UmbongoJongo
07-04-2006, 01:55 PM
I have been looking to buy the Nikon d50 I decision I found quite easy to make it seemed to have the right features, price and felt right in my hands for me, someone who wants to make to step up to DSLR, but wants to learn as I go without diving right in there with a suitcase of cash.
However I am struggling with lens decisions and after about a month of reading magazines, review sites, forums and checking out others photos at flickr and pbase. I'm still confused as to which lens to go with.
Nikon 18 - 70 (d70 kit lens)
Nikon 28 - 105mm f/3.5-4.5D IF
Sigma 18 - 125mm f3.5-5.6
I had also considered
Nikon 18 - 55 (d50 kit lens) focal range is too short for what I think I will want to shoot
Nikon 24-120 (old non VR and new VR) too expensive from locale retailers
Nikon 24-85 AFS (the dust issues I've heard about this one effecting the lens and AFS motor scared me off)
sigma 18-200mm (the 18-125 seemed to be considered to be a better quality lens and the longer focal range struggled)
This will be my first DSLR, but given that my previous shooting was outside around parks and lakes(scenery and nature), some architecture, and the macro shots of flowers and creepy crawlies. I am leaning towards the Nikon 28-105 as this seems to have a more appropriate focal range and the macro option so I can learn more. I was used to stitching images together with my old point and shoot to get a better panorama
I guess my biggest question is will I miss the wide end horribly and be running out for another lens quickly with the 28-105mm or with the sigma will I be regretting it in terms of CA and sharpness.
Any help or other suggestions appreciated
Andrew
However I am struggling with lens decisions and after about a month of reading magazines, review sites, forums and checking out others photos at flickr and pbase. I'm still confused as to which lens to go with.
Nikon 18 - 70 (d70 kit lens)
Nikon 28 - 105mm f/3.5-4.5D IF
Sigma 18 - 125mm f3.5-5.6
I had also considered
Nikon 18 - 55 (d50 kit lens) focal range is too short for what I think I will want to shoot
Nikon 24-120 (old non VR and new VR) too expensive from locale retailers
Nikon 24-85 AFS (the dust issues I've heard about this one effecting the lens and AFS motor scared me off)
sigma 18-200mm (the 18-125 seemed to be considered to be a better quality lens and the longer focal range struggled)
This will be my first DSLR, but given that my previous shooting was outside around parks and lakes(scenery and nature), some architecture, and the macro shots of flowers and creepy crawlies. I am leaning towards the Nikon 28-105 as this seems to have a more appropriate focal range and the macro option so I can learn more. I was used to stitching images together with my old point and shoot to get a better panorama
I guess my biggest question is will I miss the wide end horribly and be running out for another lens quickly with the 28-105mm or with the sigma will I be regretting it in terms of CA and sharpness.
Any help or other suggestions appreciated
Andrew