PDA

View Full Version : What I did Saturday...


erichlund
03-20-2006, 01:07 PM
I took a course at the local Calumet Photography store on Professional Studio Lighting. Very interesting stuff. Not that I will use it very often, but since you can rent the equipment very cheap, I may do something for my In-laws 50th Anniversary.

In addition to the usual stuff like safety, types of equipment, why certain types are better than others and the like, we covered how to set up a shot with from 1 to 4 lights.

The camera/lens set used for the class was a Canon 1Ds MkII and the 85mm f1.2. The 12 students ranged from pros wanting to move into studio work, and even some already in studio, to amateurs that got drafted to do something, to a few like myself that were just there to soak up information.

You can get a saleable portrait shot with a single light and a good large softbox (we used a 52" hexagonal). Set the subject about 6' in front of the background, with the camera about 8' in front of the subject (depending on desired framing and what lens you are using, this may vary). The softbox is set perpendicular to the axis of the light (feathered), with the subject at the back edge of the light. The light is just out of frame. This actually results in a photo that is much more dramatic than you get with the typical 4 light setup (main light, fill, background and hair). But, it may not be to Aunt Betty's taste. I suspect expectation plays a big role in what people want from a portrait, hence the "Olan Mills" look.

On a two light system, it is much more important to light the background than to fill or provide a hairlight. Lighting the background provides a 3d effect, separating your subject from the background. This is more important in a setup where your main is from the front of the subject (about 30 degrees off center), because that light spills to the background and can cause shadows as well as flattening the image. You can always fill with a reflector.

A three light setup typically is a main, fill and background. This really starts to look like the "Olan Mills" setup, and the subject is very evenly lit. Most people going to get a portrait are typically looking for the evenly lit look. As an alternative, you can do the poor man's 4 light setup, Using three lights, Main, hair, background, and using a reflector for fill. The problem with reflectors is that while we could control the lights to 1/10 stop, a reflector is much less precise.

The 4 light setup IS the typical "Olan Mills" setup, with main, fill, background and hair. It's obviously also the most expensive setup.

Your main light is typically set at least 1/2 stop stronger than your other lights. Shutter speed is divorced from your lights. We were mostly running 1/125 second, as that will stop most any studio motion and eliminate most ambient light from the equation. We were also using mostly f/11 to give a satisfactory depth of field. You meter your lights to the aperture you wish to shoot. Note: it's not easy to light for a very wide aperture, because you have to set the lights at very low power.

We were also shown two ways to do high key lighting, a portable rig with a translucent white screen and two lights, and a studio setup with a white paper background and a full 4 light setup.

The portable rig used a light set for f22 from behind the frame, and the main light was set for the camera's f11. This resulted in a background that is completely void of detail. In the studio setup, all the lights are set evenly at f11, but since the other lights are as powerful as the main, the background is again displayed totally without detail.

erichlund
03-20-2006, 11:06 PM
BTW - The individual teaching the class has done lots of pro work, but is currently the store manager, so he doesn't do as much right now. However, a couple of non-lighting perspectives he brought up:

1. Nikon's availability of 10mp chips has largely dried up when Sony bought the KM mount. I suspect the situation will alleviate itself over time, but there was word of a Sony 10mp dSLR for fall, and that's what is probably hurting availability for Nikon.

2. Calumet still sells film, but the local store in Santa Ana is only stocking B&W for the college students. They cannot afford to stock anything else. They were stocking some color, but as of March, it became a one day order item from their LA store. Film is dead.

The first of the two items I will take with a grain of salt. The second is the store manager's direct perspective about his own store.

Jredtugboat
03-21-2006, 10:34 AM
I took a course at the local Calumet Photography store on Professional Studio Lighting. Very interesting stuff. Not that I will use it very often, but since you can rent the equipment very cheap, I may do something for my In-laws 50th Anniversary.


Erich,

Thanks for sharing your experiences. I'm a moderately advanced amateur photographer and am looking to learn the same sort of lighting skills. I bought the Nikon School "Shooting at the speed of light" DVD and found it really inspiring, so I'm interested to see what sorts of results you got.

BTW, Olan Mills? Is that the chain studio that you get in malls, Sears, etc.?

I've been doing a bunch of grip and grin shots at a local museum; I can get access very easily to events and the Nikon/SB-600 set up looks very "official", I guess, because I've only had one refusal so far. I really have gotten a kick out of it and learned, by happenstance, the "reverse bounce" technique, which has produced some (for me) knockout results.

I've found that talking up my subjects and showing them the results has also had very positive effects--so far I have three subjects who are willing to pose in my experimental studio (not yet built) at home, in the future...

So anyway, thanks again for sharing--it was cool to see someone else report on "school" experiences.

Yours,

Julian

erichlund
03-21-2006, 11:27 AM
Erich,

Thanks for sharing your experiences. I'm a moderately advanced amateur photographer and am looking to learn the same sort of lighting skills. I bought the Nikon School "Shooting at the speed of light" DVD and found it really inspiring, so I'm interested to see what sorts of results you got.
It was not really a hands on class. Lot's of demonstration, and the students were also the models.

BTW, Olan Mills? Is that the chain studio that you get in malls, Sears, etc.?
Yup. Olan Mills is the Walmart of photo studios. Sears is another common location. They pretty much do formula portraits. I suspect there are some with a bit more creativity, but you probably have to ask for it.

I've been doing a bunch of grip and grin shots at a local museum; I can get access very easily to events and the Nikon/SB-600 set up looks very "official", I guess, because I've only had one refusal so far. I really have gotten a kick out of it and learned, by happenstance, the "reverse bounce" technique, which has produced some (for me) knockout results.

I've found that talking up my subjects and showing them the results has also had very positive effects--so far I have three subjects who are willing to pose in my experimental studio (not yet built) at home, in the future...
One point he made was that you really cannot get pro lighting results from a set of camera flashes. The camera flash is a portable location tool where it would be inconvenient or impossible to set up a professional lighting system.

The problem is that the point light source is too small, and not powerful enough to properly fill professional quality modifiers (like 60" umbrella and 52" softbox). They lose so much light that they cannot bring sufficient light to the subject. They are also difficult to set up, because how do you aim them. You have to fire them to aim. The SB800 has a modelling light, but it's not designed to be powerful enough to work in a proper modifier.

So anyway, thanks again for sharing--it was cool to see someone else report on "school" experiences.

Yours,

Julian
This was my first experience with pro lighting systems, and it was a real eye opener to see the differences you get with the various modifiers. He ran a set of shots through the varios sizes of parabolic reflectors, including a beauty dish (a wide reflector with a center baffle, so only the outer, reflected light goes to the subject) and a snoop (a cone that focuses the light in a small area. Also two sizes of umbrellas and the 52" hexagonal softbox. The larger modifiers clearly had a significant impact on image quality.