Prospero
03-05-2006, 01:47 PM
I was looking on the Nikon Support website, when I happened to come across this (http://nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/nikoneurope_en.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=16079&p_created=1130863130&p_sid=7PSA9K1i&p_accessibility=&p_lva=&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPSZwX3NvcnRfYnk9JnBfZ3JpZHNvcnQ9JnBfc m93X2NudD01NDQmcF9wcm9kcz0mcF9jYXRzPSZwX3B2PSZwX2N 2PSZwX3NlYXJjaF90eXBlPWFuc3dlcnMuc2VhcmNoX25sJnBfc GFnZT0x&p_li=&p_topview=1) article. Perhaps this is old news for you all, but I didn't know it yet.
As can be read in the article, the EN-EL3 batteries which are used in D50, D70, and D100 cameras can become defective and may as a result get overheated when recharging. Therefore Nikon is recalling the EN-EL3 with the serial numbers mentioned in the article.
The serial number on my battery is also mentioned in the article. However, as the problem is very rare, is it really worth going through all the trouble of sending the battery back and waiting for a new one?
As can be read in the article, the EN-EL3 batteries which are used in D50, D70, and D100 cameras can become defective and may as a result get overheated when recharging. Therefore Nikon is recalling the EN-EL3 with the serial numbers mentioned in the article.
The serial number on my battery is also mentioned in the article. However, as the problem is very rare, is it really worth going through all the trouble of sending the battery back and waiting for a new one?