More stinkin ducks. And another bird.

[cdifoto]

I used the 70-200 f/2.8 for some of these, and Bigma for others. Can't really remember which ones are which and don't feel like sorting them out. However, I do remember having the 70-200 on for the bird in flight. The bird in flight isn't the hottest shot ever but it was unexpected, and my lens was really too short. It's a heavy crop.

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a304/cdifoto/quacks/2006-02-12_001.jpg

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a304/cdifoto/quacks/2006-02-12_012.jpg

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a304/cdifoto/quacks/2006-02-12_014.jpg

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a304/cdifoto/misc/2006-02-12_016.jpg

[jamison55]

Cool hawk shot... I hate birds, but hawks are cool.

Dude, you need a hot girlfriend with a Victoria's Secret credit card and no modesty so you have something better to shoot than ducks :D .

[cdifoto]

Cool hawk shot... I hate birds, but hawks are cool.

Hah thanks. I only had one opportunity to shoot him and that was all I got. The 70-200 is extremely short but the focusing is sweet. When I can afford a super long L prime like the 400 f/2.8 or similiar, I'll get one. Not necessarily for birds but anything. Bigma is great for the money but those L's can't be beat.

Dude, you need a hot girlfriend with no modesty so you have something better to shoot than ducks :D .

Don't I know it. Although I must say I'd probably be doing things with (to?) her
that don't involve a camera more! :eek: :D ;)

[sherlock]

Don't I know it. Although I must say I'd probably be doing things with (to?) her
that don't involve a camera more! :eek: :D ;)

HAHAHA :D Thanks guys for providing some entertainment while I'm cooped up in my house!:D