Casio EX-S600 or Sony DSC-T9 ???

[Yaki]

wich one should i get??

http://images.akihabaranews.com/news_pics/10527/2.jpg
or
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/sony/dsc_t9-review/camera-front-angled.jpg

the ex-s600 looks real sweet but the dsc-t9 seems to be slightly better? :confused: :confused:

[madkat]

Hi Yaki,

You can check out what I thought of the DSC-T9 here (http://www.dcresource.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15832)

Hope that helps.

Cheers,

Madkat

[Pixel8]

The S600 is one great bit of jewlery. Does it work any better (image quality) than the S500? It would be worth trading off _some_ photo quality for it, but not to the point where pictures look lifeless or weird. MK - have you used it?

[Yaki]

anybody? :confused:

[madkat]

Hi Yaki/Pixel8,

I have not seen or used the S600 myself, however I stumbled upon this (http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Casio-Exilim-EX-S600-Digital-Camera-Review-.htm) whilst browsing the web.

Here's what they had to say:

Conclusion
The EX-S600 isn't our style. It's very small and the design is bold, but the sad fact is that these are the most appealing things about the camera, and they won't help anyone take pictures. We appreciate that the camera is made of metal, but that's only a good start at making a durable imager. A camera is only as tough as its most vulnerable part, and the EX-S600'slens assembly and unsealed battery and memory compartment are pretty vulnerable. If the color and size were wrapped around a good imaging system, if the camera were tough enough to go where it can fit, and if it were easy to hold securely, we'd be enthusiastic. As it stands, there is clearly a market for tiny cameras; however, they generally come with some compromises. Unfortunately, for the S600, one of them is image quality.

There are no sample photos though...

Hope this helps,

Madkat

[Yaki]

thanx i think i'll go with the dsc-t9 ;)