Ishkabibble
11-07-2005, 02:56 PM
I have been oogling the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 lens for some time now, but hesitate because I question the price/benefit ratio. I like the 1lb 28-300 I presently own (F3.5-6.3), but find it is somewhat slow for certain occasions (Christmas play coming up for example). Can anyone suggest a compromise between weight and speed that is worth considering? Have I narrowed this to the best option for my needs?
Factors in my decision:
Cost: <$1G CDN (or <$800 USD)
Weight: 3lb max, lighter is much better
Speed: F2.8 or better (haha, better than 2.8 at this price?!?)
Length: max 14-15" retracted, including camera
Range: must include 100-200 range or close to it (would love more)
Functions:Does not need to function on automatic mode (older Pentax lenses come to mind, but which ones?)
The Sigma comes in at $1100 CDN, slightly out of my price range.
I'm also interested in a fast wide angle, and see Sigma has come out with a non-fish-eye 14mm F1.4; has anyone tried it?
Factors in my decision:
Cost: <$1G CDN (or <$800 USD)
Weight: 3lb max, lighter is much better
Speed: F2.8 or better (haha, better than 2.8 at this price?!?)
Length: max 14-15" retracted, including camera
Range: must include 100-200 range or close to it (would love more)
Functions:Does not need to function on automatic mode (older Pentax lenses come to mind, but which ones?)
The Sigma comes in at $1100 CDN, slightly out of my price range.
I'm also interested in a fast wide angle, and see Sigma has come out with a non-fish-eye 14mm F1.4; has anyone tried it?