gattaca
11-04-2005, 11:04 PM
Hi all,
First up, I'm quite clueless when it comes to photographic hardware so kindly forgive my ignorance or if i'm asking the obvious. :o
Have a rather weird (and i suspect silly) question to ask.
In your opinion which combination is a better one?
Having a good non-UZ camera such as the Olympus C-7070 WZ or Coolpix 8400 and attaching a teleconverter whenever i need a zoom.
or
A UZ camera like the FZ5, s5200 or S2 and attaching a wide angle whenever I need a.. umm wider view.
Thing is, I'm actually looking some versatility in a camera by having both wide angle as well as zoom capabilities,
but am just wondering which combination would produce better quality images on the whole (or with fewer problems: Chromatic Aberration, Vignetting etc)
I seem to gather from some camerashops that Ultra zoom cameras tend to have better lenses(such as ED in the Olympus SP500UZ) while non-uz cams have better sensors. Is that true? If so, which is more important?
First up, I'm quite clueless when it comes to photographic hardware so kindly forgive my ignorance or if i'm asking the obvious. :o
Have a rather weird (and i suspect silly) question to ask.
In your opinion which combination is a better one?
Having a good non-UZ camera such as the Olympus C-7070 WZ or Coolpix 8400 and attaching a teleconverter whenever i need a zoom.
or
A UZ camera like the FZ5, s5200 or S2 and attaching a wide angle whenever I need a.. umm wider view.
Thing is, I'm actually looking some versatility in a camera by having both wide angle as well as zoom capabilities,
but am just wondering which combination would produce better quality images on the whole (or with fewer problems: Chromatic Aberration, Vignetting etc)
I seem to gather from some camerashops that Ultra zoom cameras tend to have better lenses(such as ED in the Olympus SP500UZ) while non-uz cams have better sensors. Is that true? If so, which is more important?