My Babies

[Esoterra]

This is why I bought my D70s

http://img344.imageshack.us/img344/8655/sydneyshots1783vg.jpg

http://img344.imageshack.us/img344/725/mtcharlstenwithconnor0413bc.jpg

[D70FAN]

This is why I bought my D70s



Great shots. "Framers" right out of the box. Looks like you employed the fill flash on these. If not, the light was pretty much perfect.

Using the 18-70 DX?

Loverly...

[Coltess]

This is why I bought my D70s
That is probably the best reason I have ever heard for buying a camera. The pics are great and the kiddies are cute too. :)

[Esoterra]

Thanks for the nice remarks. George, to answer your question, I bought the D70s body only and im using my old Quanta 28-90 (42-135 for DSLR). I dont know if its a "quality" lens or not.. I only paid $150 for it at Ritz Camera, and they told me it's mid-range... I'm curious... is the 18-70 DX that much better of a lens that it would have been worth paying the extra 300$? ( D70s $899 body only....$1199 with lens).

Eso

[SVT4ME]

I can't think of a better reason to buy a camera. :)

Nice pictures.

[D70FAN]

Thanks for the nice remarks. George, to answer your question, I bought the D70s body only and im using my old Quanta 28-90 (42-135 for DSLR). I dont know if its a "quality" lens or not.. I only paid $150 for it at Ritz Camera, and they told me it's mid-range... I'm curious... is the 18-70 DX that much better of a lens that it would have been worth paying the extra 300$? ( D70s $899 body only....$1199 with lens).

Eso

Nope. If it works don't fix it. Down the road you might want a little more range, but your pictures are proof that an inexpensive (ok, cheap) lens can take great pictures (with the right camera and photographer).

I think a little of a parents pride show through as well. ;)

I'm a sucker for kids and dogs.