markyb
07-16-2005, 12:48 PM
hi guys
ive posted one or two posts regarding printed photos not looking the same as on the pc monitor.
ie:colours not as vivid on the printed ones.
all the replys seem to be the same . calibration. both printer and monitor.
i tried the monitor using the adobe gamma setting .
apart from changing my monitors colouring the printed photos were no better or worse.
thinking about it how can changing the monitor colours affect the finished print.
its like taping off the tv on to a vcr the recording comes off the original source ie:ariel or sat dish.
it doesnt matter if the tv screen is b&w or even if no tv is present. the recording is still the same.
so why should this be any different. the photo is coming off the hard drive or the memory card if it is in a reader.ive also tried changing settings on the printer r200. printed the same pic over and over again with and without print image matching . i find it better without pim.
so what is my next move
ive posted one or two posts regarding printed photos not looking the same as on the pc monitor.
ie:colours not as vivid on the printed ones.
all the replys seem to be the same . calibration. both printer and monitor.
i tried the monitor using the adobe gamma setting .
apart from changing my monitors colouring the printed photos were no better or worse.
thinking about it how can changing the monitor colours affect the finished print.
its like taping off the tv on to a vcr the recording comes off the original source ie:ariel or sat dish.
it doesnt matter if the tv screen is b&w or even if no tv is present. the recording is still the same.
so why should this be any different. the photo is coming off the hard drive or the memory card if it is in a reader.ive also tried changing settings on the printer r200. printed the same pic over and over again with and without print image matching . i find it better without pim.
so what is my next move